America thought it was safe from the dreadful plague of terrorism scouring the rest of the world. Americans don't like security measures. They're going to like Hakim Arif even less. Hakim Arif, leader of a militant Isamic terrorist organization, knows how vulnerable the U.S. is, and he intends to demonstrate that to the world. Preveiously published by Ace Books.
Dean Charles Ing was an American author, who usually wrote in the science fiction and techno-thriller genres.
He earned a bachelor’s degree from Fresno State University (1956), a master’s degree from San Jose State University (1970), and a Ph.D. from the University of Oregon (1974). It was his work in communication theory at the University of Oregon that prompted him to turn to writing in the 1970s.
Dean Ing was a veteran of the United States Air Force, an aerospace engineer, and a university professor who holds a doctorate in communications theory. He became professional writer in 1977. Ing and his wife lived in Oregon.
Much of Ing's fiction includes detailed, practical descriptions of techniques and methods which would be useful in an individual or group survival situation, including instructions for the manufacture of tools and other implements, the recovery of stuck vehicles and avoidance of disease and injury.
In addition to his fiction writing, Ing wrote nonfiction articles for the survivalist newsletter P.S. Letter, edited by Mel Tappan. Following in the footsteps of sci-fi novelist Pat Frank, Ing included a lengthy nonfiction appendix to his nuclear war survival novel Pulling Through.
In Ing’s fiction, his characters are involved with scientific or engineering solutions and entrepreneurial innovation, elements drawn from his own experience. A lifelong tinkerer, designer, and builder, he was an Air Force crew chief and a senior engineer for United Technologies and Lockheed. His characters know how things work, and they use ingenuity and engineering to solve situational challenges. Ing's work reflects the Oregon traditions of self-reliant independence and suspicion of authority.
“Since I deplore the voracious appetite of the public for entertainment-for-entertainment’s sake,” he told an interviewer in 1982, “most of my work has a clear didactic element. . . . I believe that Jefferson’s ideal of the independent yeoman farmer should be familiar to every generation because I mistrust a technological society in which most members are thoroughly incompetent to maintain the hardware or the software.”
Four stars for the plot, five stars for some of the writing (quite a few good images), and one star for the rest of the writing, which was too often intensely imprecise, making the reader guess what the author meant, and making the reader guess who was speaking during dialogue. Average felt like it oughta be 3 stars. I had to read about 500 pages in this 276-page novel due to all the backtracking it took to figure out what was going on. Like I said, it was written in an incredibly imprecise way. Ben Bova's blurb: "Should be read by everyone." Sorry Ben, but "nope." It shouldn't. It was also touted as a science fiction novel, and NOTHING could be further from the truth. It was a standard political thriller, imprecisely written. Copyright 1979, so maybe back then they didn't know what to call it, but it ain't SF.