A thin volume inexorably bound to its time and place (1920s Germany), it's surprising at times how the principles of NSDAP platform, when transposed, echo modern, mainstream and semi-mainstream political planks and protestor demands, once one (sadly) strips out the anti-semitism (a phrase used liberally in the translation with a strikingly positive connotation): it seems there is something eternal and recurring here of the thoughts and feelings of downtrodden, defeated people in an unstable, decaying social order - people who are backed in to a corner and at the edge of permanent defeat - compelled to struggle against the risk of irretrievable loss of their history, identity, genetic interests, and way of life.
None of the above can be said for Mao's Little Red Book, or, for that matter, the Communist Manifesto (at least it couldn't be said until the rise of Black Lies Matter, who ironically repristinate the Dead Straight White Guy for their own purposes while channeling his Jewish Frankfurt School interpreters), with which it shares some faint similarity in organization - e.g., 'the party is not a normal political party, but a transitional organization which shall cease to exist upon the implementation of its 25 points'.
The point-by-point Party Platform, unlike Mao's LRB, is coherent and systematic (and far less megalomaniac and messianic) and, if light on the details, achieves a certain unity of vision and practicality beyond platitudes. In comparison, it is obvious the LRB is a product of a thought-policing dictatorship of the worst sort. On reflection, it's not surprising, given that the NSDAP was pretty much the only organization of its type (even counting the 'Founding Fathers' - now that's a thought) to gain power through legitimate, pre-existing channels as opposed to through violent revolution.
Unlike Das Kapital (an extremely ponderous work of two thousand pages which I am far from finishing, and a poor comparison of an entirely different genre) is straightforward and easy to read - as would be expected of a political platform as opposed to the lucubrations of a philosopher-economist who thought he was the anointed Hegelian ushering in the end of history and realizing the Absolute in material terms.
One can glimpse in the Party Programme, at times, parts of the foundations for what Nazism could have become, though it is present here only in figures and shadows which are seen clearly, I think, only ex post facto, and which leave one with more questions than are answered.
(Pre-Nov 2018 review)