Well, that's behind me. Thank god. I seriously wanted to kill myself while reading this book. Or maybe not myself - killing the main ""hero"" would definitely bring me more satisfaction.
It was so bad I just couldn't bring myself to give even the two stars that is usually my minimum, beause really, I cannot support this book even with that "for the effort" star. Now, what was wrong with this book, you ask? I raise you a better question: what wasn't?
Let's do a check. You know, like the ones you do when you pack for vacation.
> was the hero a dick?
I'd say not telling the heroine her boyfriend was dead and then proceeding to pretend he was him definitely qualified. Especially since he was his brother, so check Now, I'm not saying - yes, it was in the blurb. What the blurb doesn't tell you, though is that the hero never tells her himself and she has to find out from his mother in 80 % of the book. Beautiful, right?
> was the hero a rapist?
Well, let's see, he slept with her when she thought he was someone else. You can can put it in the same box as sleeping with someone without the condom you both agreed on (or let's imagine, I dunno, I'm not saying a villain, but I'm also not saying it's not a villain - a character who, I don't know, has the magical ability to transform into people... now imagine this person putting on the face of someone's boyfriend and sleeping with them while they think he's actually their boyfriend. Rape, right? No supernatural element present here, but definitely basically the same thing). And let's not forget about that scene where she screamed at him to let her go and yet he was all like "I can feel she wants me haha" sure, there was no sex at that time, but he still touched her when she didn't want to be touched, so check
> was the hero saying things that made me want to puke?
Jesus, his goddamn "omg daniel do something so that I don't do this thing" attitude just pissed me off... Like dude, your dead brother has no power here. this is all on you. Also the whole thing with not telling her who he was - she had to find out from someone else. Don't tell me he just had no way of saying it to her, this was a deliberate action on his part not to tell her. So what that he "didn't want to ruin her happiness"?? that was not up to him to decide what she should and shouldn't know. Also, this beautiful sentence "She wouldn't be so cold-hearted as to divorce me when there is a child within our marriage" - but it's completely okay for him to be so cold-hearted as to pretend to be the man she loved? check
> was the hero doing things that made me want to puke?
Well... let's see... he married the heroine, got her with kid, so that he could have "leverage" on her when she finally did find out... you know who has leverages in relationships? abusers. check
> was the heroine kinda stupid?
he didn't remember she was a virgin and she doesn't even stop and think about how that's kinda weird... I mean, jesus. check
> was there a female in the heroine's life present so that she could tell heroine how she should forgive the hero for the shit he did?
I seriously hate this one. Why do the authors feel the need to do this. Zak went to Audrey's aunt, told her all what he did and the aunt's just like "oh dear... we gotta get you back together"?? I mean what... that fucker does not need her support. Audrey does. Jesus (I swear, this book might just make me find god with how many jesuses I'm throwing around here). check
> was there a completely stupid "omg zak is actually the love of my life" moment of revelation at the end?
Unfortunately check . I actually loved the heroine the first few pages after what she found out, because she was uncompromising, stopped taking any of his shit. But then they separated for a while and suddenly she was all like "omg there's a big hole in my heart... omg Zak was actually so, so generous and wonderful human being and I can't let my child grow up without a father!!" two things: no, he's the most selfish prick I've ever had the "pleasure" to read about in books. And I'm counting the villains. And two: yes, you absolutely can have your kid grow up without a father. You shouldn't put your justification, your needs on hold just because "the kid needs a father". The kid would have a father. Does not mean you have to suffer through life with him. (Not saying she was suffering, of course, the author wrapped everything with a pretty neat bow at the end - lol - but definitely a good life advice, especially when you have a support system thanks to which you don't need the prick)
> was there a complete disregard of the hero's brother's life?
Oh man... that is a big fat check with a cherry on top. Honestly, what the author did with this - The brother, Daniel, sends his identical twin, Zak, to comfort his fiancé. The first thing Zak does is he sleeps with her (okay, maybe third. After kissing her twice.). Now, he's racked with guilt, right, who wouldn't be! Except... Zak doesn't stop there, no. He decides to claim Audrey as his, wanting to completely obliterate his brother from her memory - ah, the sibling's love, huh? And then at the end, the author makes it seem as if the brother was actually playing matchmaker and this is what he wanted from the start. Like, that's what the hero and heroine came to. Like, no. Absolutely not. But, well, in the end, the author just managed to make Zak into a loving brother (lol, I'd kill my sister if she did what Zak did, I'm not even kidding) who just... loves... his brother... so... very... much... and just honors his memory... by banging his fiancé under the false pretenses that he is, in fact, Daniel. Ah yes. Loves his brother so much. Sure.
Okay, rant over. I'm going to go puke now.
(p.s. What I have to say, so that this isn't just completely negative, I was really disappointed with this, because I actually liked Rae's first book and her writing is actually pretty good. But this was just such a miss for me, so on top of a really shitty story, there's a big disappointment in it, too)