While I do not believe the post office created America, it can't be denied that our postal service is one of the country's cornerstones. The founders established this institution in an effort to provide the populace with the means to communicate and inform - and in so doing created the requirement for roads and outposts, transportation hubs and, above all, a constant stream of connective innovations that would serve the needs of their ever-expanding nation. The railway system owes a great deal to the postal service. The airline industry owes a great deal to the postal service. And in this time of pandemic, when a trip to a polling place could cost you your life, our democracy will likely owe a great deal to the postal service.
Winifred Gallagher, an author of several well-regarded books (most of which have to do with the experience of being human), has produced an exhaustively researched history of the United States Postal Service. There are facts here by the hundreds, and asides enough to nudge those frequently dry realities along...
Though twenty-four-year-old Abraham Lincoln didn't own the general store in New Salem, Illinois, he was appointed its postmaster by Postmaster General William Barry and served from 1833 to 1836. Other than the valued benefit of access to lots of newspapers, his rewards were modest, amounting to $55.70 in 1835, but then, so were his duties, considering that the mail came to town only once a week. Lincoln obligingly delivered any letters not picked up in a timely fashion, carrying them in his hat.
Pertinent to the present day, Gallagher explains that the office of Postmaster General has always been, since the department's founding, a presidential appointment offered as reward for past political support. This is not new or unique to Mr. Trump. If one is looking for a responsible party on the issue of the postal service's funding, functionality, and future, one must look squarely at Congress. The more astute among us will have noticed their congressional representatives doing a bit of a soft shoe around the matter at the moment. There are reasons for that, and this author shares them in a clear and helpful way.
Lest you become too enchanted, I will warn that there are a great number of arid passages here that have the texture of a middle school textbook and are certain to promote the sort of woolgathering one remembers from that time. Still, if you plan on following the hearings on this topic, or sliding into a healthy debate? This is the postal history you're looking for. Hands down.