linsday: i can't believe this girl that's delusional and self-absorbed lied about being engaged to a dead guy and stole a family heirloom to prove it. i've seen all that is Evil and Wretched that the world has to offer. how can i ever be happy again?
garry, who's on sick leave because he almost died and went insane in the trenches of ww1: girl-
anyway, i don't even really know if i liked this book, so we'll do the good and not-so-good.
the good: the writing is really good! Nan Shepherd is talented. the descriptions of nature are really pleasant, the use and degree of use of patois is a very convenient indicator of hierarchy in a small society, for both writer and reader, and it's used very intelligently here. the characters are consistent within themselves. the plot isn't very important since this is more of a slice of life/character study, but it's well-woven. some characters were really interesting, and i particularly liked how their perceived morality and immorality was explored - especially nell, louie morgan and bawbie.
now, for the not-so-good: before you even start the novel, there's two issues. i have the canongate edition, and the prologue is bad. i've never had a book where i read the foreword and then started the book and was more confused. i myself took a while to finish the novel, but the foreword felt as though its author had read the book a couple years before and written it from memory. it's vague, and i never recommend to skip forewords, even when they have spoilers and especially for classics and older books, but yeah, don't read it, it's not changing anything. then we have the character list. terrible. 0/10. tons of characters are missing, including some that share first names with others on the list, and a lot of nicknames are omitted too. irrelevant information though? oh you bet it's in there. 90% of the information i would have needed isn't there, and 90% of the information that is is useless and irrelevant. a lot of characters are introduced in quick succession, and i kept having to go back to the list, only for it to be useless. my last point - and biggest issue with the novel - is that, for a character study, the characters sure aren't good. and i don't mean they're bad people or badly written. they're well-written, and i could not care less about the moral compass of a character when I'm judging the writing of a book. they just... kinda suck. they fall flat, and strange.
there are a Lot of examples of that. Lindsay, who kind of is the/a main character, is a whiny, stupid brat. she's daft, and uninteresting, and incapable of forming a thought for herself. sure, she's only 19, but it doesn't make her any more compelling, and it doesn't excuse her complete and total lack of evolution throughout the book. she's a pale caricature of what a middle-age man might believe teenagers are like. Garry has his moments, but he's just insufferable half of the time. Johathan, who's supposed to be some sort of creator of rumors and mockery and sayings, is just a buffoon, and i couldn't understand what he was saying or what he was mocking half of the time, which certainly didn't make him less annoying.
i think the worst part of it is how Everyone behaves around the Louie Morgan thing. basically, louie is delusional, self-important and addicted to being the center of attention - the problem is that she lacks any qualities that would make this happen organically. so she uses the fact that a man who used to live in the village just died of illness - soon after his mother passed - to start lying about their having been engaged for attention. when she realises her story is flimsy, she steals an heirloom ring from the grieving father/husband. garry, who was friends with the deceased, immediately calls bull, and is outraged that the whole village just... bought it. surely this is going to be a compelling plot and commentary on small societies? nah. when he tries to call her out on it, lindsay says he can't do that because that'd be... questioning a woman's character? that was one of the stupidest moments of the book, for sure. women are treated as a dozen different kind of creatures throughout the book, none quite as human or fleshed-out as the men, and it's grating at best. anyway the whole village loses their mind at the idea of a woman lying or stealing, and act like it's the end of the world, when none of them even remotely liked louie before, and only started pitying her because they just bought her lie. they all act like them finding her out and telling the truth is a bigger crime than... disrespecting a dead man's memory for your own personal gain and stealing valuables from his family? what even.
i might sound harsh, but a lot of them were unpleasant, inconsistent or barely more than caricatures. i would have loved to hear more about the ones that were not, like paradise, nell and louie morgan, rather than have lindsay walk through her third pathetic fallacy of the day or garry change his mind more than he shaves (why did Shepherd insist on his being unshaven and ugly so much?? he's nicknamed the gargoyle in the character list, and i'm not even sure he's called that twice in the book). i was actually about to finish this book on what i saw as a high note, a closer last look into the mind of nell falconer, one of the most interesting characters whose point of view is explored. and then it fell short of making a point and the last page was, as many passages were, completely unintelligible. i could not tell you what was meant in the last page of the book if my life depended on it. i could not even tell you how many characters are there, because even that is not made clear.
and i wish this were a case of me being very little literate, and diving into my first book that isn't YA where everything is spelled out for you, but no. i've read dostoyevsky and been more certain of the plot than i was reading this. at the end of the day, Nan Shepherd fell short of developing enough fleshed-out, interesting characters to populate a whole novel. i might read her non-fiction, since both her style and descriptions of nature are incredibly pleasant, but i don't think i will be reading any more of her novels.