In some ways, I'm glad I read this novel with two other Vince Flynn tomes in the same week (Thank you, Christmas Vacation). This novel reminds me of everything that I really like about Vince Flynn books--why I started reading them, why I have bought all his novels, and why, until a few years ago, I would miss any of them.
Unfortunately, it also dramatically illustrtates how Vince had gotten off course in the last two books.
The novel is a textbook example of what Vince Flynn does best. Multiple characters in multiple settings living out multiple plot lines, all deftly brought together at the end. Good people, operating with a different set of priorities, sometimes getting in the way. Yes, there are real bad guys, but there are a few thoughful, more moderate peple around the bad guys who wonder how the violence will affect their own countries and their own people's chance for a better tomorrow.
Briefly put, the villain in this set piece is the Presdient of Iran, who looks very much like the current "elected' leader of the country formerly known as Persia. The country's premier nuclear power plant, which is really a power plant that is disguised as a site for the fabrication of nuclear weapons, suddenly collapses. Eager to use this disaster to further his own political ends, he leaps to blame the US and Israel, and launches a number of plots that will 'make America pay.'
Given the events of the last few years, Flynn seems prophetic. The real Presdient of Iran has acted much in the way the fictional Pres of the novel has, and thus the novel rings true.
Even more interesting are two smaller characters; the first is the Mossad agent who is actually responsible for the destruction of the nuclear facility. He has penetrated the building as a janitor and has become part of the furniture; he is a bit pained by what he must do--not because he has any illusitons about the nuclear plans of Iran, but in the several years he has worked for the facility, he has been treated with kindness and respect by some of the staff members. He makes sure a couple of the poeple he knows to be good are not in the facility when it collapses.
Also of interest is the head of the Iranian intelligence services, who sees how mad the president is becoming and who counsels moderation, seeking to do what is best for his country and people. Although he is not pro-American, he is not knee-jerk anti-American and insists that actions and plans be based on actual facts rather than on political agendas. Being moderate and thoughtful is a very dangerous stance in the Iran that Flynn creases.
Even more interesting is the historical take on Iran since the '79 revolution. Initially, many different political factions united to overthrought the Shah, who was a pretty bad guy. But in the days since the revolution, the factions have divided and those who were the most religiously extremist have risen to power and have often persecuted their former allies, those who thougth they were building a more just, free, and open country. And, again, other information I have read and heard places Flynn on firm ground, so that his work seems more like current evetns history than a novel. He's done a masterful job.
Mithc Rapp, Flynn's series hero, is more beleiveable and more likeable in ths book than he is in others. He is still headstrong, a wild card, and is totally committed to defending his country regardless of the cost. But in this case, he is also willing to listen to other people's plans, to listen to reason, and there are still lines that he resists crossing (he stops short of castrating a man but uses body parts of a cadaver to make people think he has done so).
Toward the end, Irene Kennedy, the director of The Agency Which Must Not Be Namaed and one of the very few people in the world Mitch considers a friend, is kidnapped. Initially, it looks as if Iraqi insurgents are responsible, but Mitch realizes it is Iran behind the attacks. He saves Kennedy, but there are also some interesting machinations, including by a President who not only supports Rapp but who is willing to shwo the strenght necessary to combat the Iranian president's lies.
This is, to me, Flynn's best book.
At this point in Flynn's career, I am reminded of two authors hundreds of years apart--Daniel Defoe and Tom Clancy. Both created a character (Rodonson Crusoe and Jack Ryan, respectively) that audiences loved and responded to, and demonstrated the ability to send them on enteresting, entertaining adventures that kept readers spellbound.
Yet both didn't seem to realize what had created the magic. Defoe thought it was his moral diatribes rather than Robinson's actions that kept readers coming back, and, although I don't know Tom Clancy's reason, many of his later books are marred by politics getting in the way of the storytelling. I have no problems with novels being political, and my loyalty in readnig both Clandy and Flynn proves, I think very clearly, that I have no problem in reading books by people whose political views differ from my own. But I, and I imaginge most readers, don't buy the books (or check them out from the library) because I want to hear discussions that I could easily hear on AM radio every day. It's because ther author has created characters that engage me and send them on adventures that make me want to turn the page and read more.
I hope that Protect and Defend shows that Flynn is an artist at the height of his powers and that Extreme Measures was a stumble; we can't all be perfect. My fear is that he'll be another Defoe, that he will mistakenly believe that his loyal following (of which I consider myself a member) is built on his politcs rather than on his storytelling ability. If that continues, I fear that his loyal following will be reducecd, not only by one (me), but by a great number. The many readers on Good Reads who've expressed frustration with the way what one authors calls' Flynn's "political pandering" (his words, not mine) slows down the storytelling.
I'm also reminded of authors like the late, great Robert Ludlum and the still living and still great John LeCarre--authors who wrote at a consistently high level throughout their career. The reasons for their success were their ability to creat character and their abilithy to storytell. Although both were quite political at times, both always remembered they were storytellers, not political commentators.
Flynn has the chance tio achieve that stature in the thriller genre--he can become to the current world what LeCarre was to the Cold War Era, the premier writer of thrillers in his time. Or he can become a Defoe--more concerned with his agenda than his reading public. As a real fan, I hope he rises rather than falls.