Lal: Star Trek teleplay for Brent Spiner

by Gail Chord Schuler, Gabrielle Chana

A 拒否スター ・ トレック: 次世代ドラマ ガブリエル チャナ ブレントスピナーの 1992 年に書いた （スタートレックのデータ: 次世代）。弟伝承 （ラル コンパニオンとしてしたい） と総破壊から彼の娘のラールを保存する、宇宙艦隊の研究で官僚データは非常識な彼に対して英雄的に、努めています。データは消滅から彼の娘を救うために究極の犠牲 (彼自身の破壊） を行う必要がありますか？ガブリエルが彼女彼女はスタッフ作家の芝生の上を踏みだったが、これは彼女を書かなければならなかった、国家 (に対して彼女の関係の彼女の子供と)、およびこの問題--彼女の彼のサポートのためのブレント ・ スパイナー感謝してによる嫌がらせのかかとに新鮮な 1992 年にこれは物語だったので物語以前放映されたエピソード (「子孫」） の続編が書いたので彼女は知っていたことを伝えます。彼女は作家になることを彼女に影響を与えたブレントスピナーを称えるために世界にそれを提供しています。その時彼女はこれを書いた、彼女だっただけ 3 か月の古い作家、彼女は過去 10 年間でいくつかの更新をしたけれども。彼女の夢として彼女はそれを書いた、ブレント、エミー賞、彼の土地は部分を記述することでした。彼女はまだそれ&

46 pages, Kindle Edition

First published June 11, 2011

Reviews

[Travis James · Rating 5 out of 5]

Would have been a great episode....

......with a little tweaking here and there. Sadly, Berman was only into episodic formatting in TNG (for the most part and Lal was never mentioned again. Totally typical for him. 😣). I would have loved to have seen Lal again. A dev wasted opportunity......

[Bob · Rating 1 out of 5]

I don't mind fanfiction. I believe that it can be a great way to stretch the limits of your imagination and become even more enthralled in your favorite fandom. Sure, some of it can be pretty bad but normally the bad writing and out of character actions are tempered by the passion that the author has for their work.

Then there's works like this.

I tried really hard to see the author's feelings in this work but it just seemed like her main agenda was to re-write the character of Lal to be a Mary Sue self-insert. Normally I'm OK with self-inserts because hey, who hasn't written or imagined a Mary Sue insert at one point or another? I'm fine with a little bit of character reimagining, but the author seems to have completely lost touch with the characters that made STTNG so wonderful- especially the characters introduced in The Offspring. The "romance" between Data and Lal was pretty creepy. I know that it was never quite stated as a romance, but that's how it comes across in this script and it creeped me out. I'm fully aware that this was the product of a new and very underdeveloped author, but I can't help but think that this would have been better kept 'in the vault' and re-written after she gained more experience.

I also want to note that despite the author claiming that this was "free", I still had to pay for it. I didn't notice that until afterwards and if the author wishes to continue the claims of 'this is free' then she needs to remove the .99 price from the item or remove the claims of it being free from the synopsis. This did not affect my rating, however. If the author really wants to have her work read, I recommend going to fanfiction (dot) net. It's free and easy to use.

I wish I could give this a higher rating but this just wasn't all that good.