Sometimes life takes unexpected turns that leave us wondering how exactly we get to where we are. Those moments of pondering almost always come with a sense of incredulity and absurdity.
For Marcus Gorman, his such moment also carries a great deal of drama and a hint of humour.
“It was dark now and I was wet to the underwear, standing in the middle of desolation, maybe about to be buried in a landslide, giving traffic directions to a bleeding, one-eyed psychopath who was, with one hand, trying to drive a mythic vehicle backwards up an enchanted mountain. I’d come a long way from the K. of C. library.”
Marcus is a lawyer who throws away a future in politics to work for the big-shot gangster / bootlegger Jack “Legs” Diamond.
Jack, with his charms, his womanizing ways, his flamboyant lifestyle, his ability (or luck) to escape death and of course his cruelty and violence, stands as a legendary figure in the prohibition era underworld, until his eventual demise.
Marcus, an otherwise “normal” man and outsider of the gangster world, serves as the chronicler of the life of the notorious Legs Diamond for us.
Having the “outsider” as the narrator is an ingenious arrangement on part of the author William Kennedy.
Why would a successful lawyer want to risk his future to get involved with the mobster? How a gangster who has murdered, robbed and kidnapped can elicit so much sympathy and sentiment from a “normal “ person?
The questions intrigued me throughout my reading of the book.
They turn what could have been a run-of-the-mill action packed gangster novel into an inspection of human psyche.
“I knew then that this man was alive in a way I was not. I saw the vital principle of his elbow, the cut of his smile, the twist of his pronged fingers. Whatever you looked at was in odd motion. He hit you, slapped you with his palm, punched you with a light fist, clapped you on the shoulder, ridding himself of electricity to avoid exploding. He was conveying it to you, generating himself into yourself whether you wanted to receive him or not. You felt something had descended upon him, tongues of fire maybe or his phlogiston itself, burning its way into your own spirit.
I liked it.”
( there is also a fascinating part where Marcus compares Legs to the great Gatsby. Apparently,Jack has met Fitzgerald, twice. Jack describes him as “a condescending young drunk the first time they met, an apologetic, decent man the second time”)
Also, our narrator Marcus is clearly well educated with a great deal of intellectual and philosophical acumen, who is capable of carrying out discourse on deeper topics like religion, good vs evil and role of media eloquently. He does not just tell the stories, he also analyses and makes us think.
This is also a genius move of Kennedy’s, all those deeper discussions blend so well into the backdrop of sex, violence and alcohol without the narration losing authenticity for even one second.
What stood out for me the most was the part where Marcus broke down how the media created a myth out of a man.
“So the newsmen, installing Jack in the same hierarchy where they placed royalty, heroes, and movie stars, created him anew as they enshrined him. They invented a version of him with each story they wrote, added to his evil luster by imagining crimes for him to commit, embellishing his history, humanizing him, defining him through their own fantasies and projections. This voyage had the effect of taking Jack Diamond away from himself, of making him a product of the collective imagination. Jack had imagined his fame all his life and now it was imagining him.”
I loved Kennedy’s writing.
The stories of Jack are told in a fragmented way, each chapter contains some vignettes from Jack’s life.
The narrative jumps from present to past and past to present quite often, and that, strangely, thickens the emotional impact, at least for me.
Kennedy is a magician that can bring a character to life with few lines, with an abundance of humour too.
“I would describe Jimmy as a giant maggot, an abominable toad with twelve-ounce eyelids and an emancipated nose that had nothing to do with the rest of his face. He was a globular figure of uncertain substance. Maybe all hotdog meat, goat’s ears and pig’s noses inside that salmony, shantung sportshirt.”
( Oh boy, Kennedy can be mean!)
I am not too sure how I feel about the depiction of women…the 1920s was not a great era for women.
When Jack’s wife wants to shoot the rifle, Jack says “You’re better with a frying pan.”
Oh, the casual misogyny.
I also didn’t particularly like the parts about the competition between the wife Alice and the mistress Kiki.
The misogyny aside ( which is inevitable considering the time period the stories take place), I still think it’s a book well worth reading.
This book is the entry to Kennedy’s Albany trilogy.
I intend to read the Pulitzer winning Ironweed, the next book in the trilogy, soon.