Clear, well-written book that talks about how stories and business fundamentals shape valuation. I read as I was also reading Poor Charlie’s Almanac, and hoped to get a better grip on how to value companies.
FIRST THIRD OF THE BOOK
The first third of the book is about why both storytelling (narrative) and numbers are important when valuing an asset:
- To be a successful business, not only do you have to build a better mousetrap, but you have to tell a compelling story about why that mousetrap will conquer the business world to investors (to raise capital), to customers (to induce purchases), and to employees (to get them to work for you)
- But storytelling that is not bounded by numbers can quickly devolve into fantasy land. Understand if a story is possible, whether it is plausible, and how probable it is. Numbers are a great way to figure this out
- This should be the golden age for numbers, more data and better analytics tools. But this surge in number-crunching and computing powers that has created a greater demand for good storytelling, often as a counterpoint to masses of numbers
- If you rely only on numbers, you can suffer from the illusion of precision (estimates are treated as facts, often leading to disastrous consequences), the illusion of objectivity (the map is not the terrain), and the Lemming Problem (if the future is going to be different from the past, the predictions based upon past data will come apart)
SECOND THIRD OF THE BOOK
The second third of the book describes classical business story models. These include:
- The bully: Company with a large market share, a superior brand name, access to lots of capital, and a reputation for ruthlessness. They will steamroll competition to deliver ever-increasing revenues and profits
- The Eureka moment: Company that claims to have found an unmet need in the market, usually in a serendipitous way, and then has come up with a way of meeting that need
- The better mousetrap: Company that contends it has a better way of delivering an existing product or service that will be more desirable and better suited to the need. They will eat into the market share of the existing players in the market
- The disruptor: Company that changes the way a business is run, altering fundamental ways in which the product or service is delivered. The status quo is ineffective and inefficient, and disruption will change the business (while making money).
It also shows how stories can often go awry. Examples are:
- Assuming you are the only one with insights: it is easy to assume that while the rest of the world stays still, your company will move quickly from opportunity to opportunity – but that assumption is usually unrealistic. When you see large market opportunities, rest assured that much of the rest of the world does as well, and when you move decisively to take advantage of them, be ready for others to be making the same moves
- It is very difficult to disrupt businesses that are being run efficiently. Not only will these established companies be better positioned to push back against disruption, but customers will be less likely to shift. If a business is badly run, insofar as the players in the business make little or no money while delivering products and services that leave their customers dissatisfied, you have the perfect storm for disruption
- Stories that assume a high perpetual growth rate (any perpetual growth rate that exceeds the nominal growth rate of the economy is impossible – as the company will then be bigger than the economy)
- Bigger than the market: your market share can never be more than 100%
- Claiming that you can simultaneously capture market share and raise prices in a competitive market
- Big market delusion: a high growth story that’s plausible at the individual company level can become implausible in the aggregate — this is what leads to funding bubbles
FINAL THIRD OF THE BOOK
This discusses the differences between pricing and valuation – and is the bit I found most valuable.
- The value of a business is determined by the magnitude of its cash flows, the risk/uncertainty of these cash flows, and the expected level and efficiency of the growth that the business will deliver. But the price of a traded asset (stock) is set by demand and supply. While the value of the business may be one input into the process, it is one of many forces. The push and pull of the market (momentums, fads, and other pricing forces) and liquidity (or the lack thereof) can cause prices to have a dynamic entirely their own, which can lead to the market price being different from value.
- In pricing, you find comparable assets in the market, look for pricing metrics that investors use in pricing these assets, and then price your asset accordingly. This can be the wrong approach if your asset has attributes that are markedly different from that of “comparable” assets
- Damodaran then gives examples of how he valued businesses in 2014 and 2015, and outlines his process in great detail. What’s fascinating is that he undervalued almost all businesses (specially tech businesses) – but not because his process was bad. He simply believed in the wrong stories (for example, not anticipating how big the online advertising industry would become or how Uber would branch out into food delivery)
CLOSING THOUGHTS
The book will help anyone who is trying to evaluate stories that value a business – from a startup founder to a public market investor. Damodaran’s process – while clearly not bulletproof – is a phenomenally structured and debuggable way to value a business, and will be a great addition to other models (mental or spreadsheet) that you use