Useful and thought-provoking, though premised on elitist principles.
This book raised a lot of personal questions that are helpful to examine while trying to figure out career - how do I want to dedicate most of my time? What is the kind of impact I want to make? What is my definition of "doing good"?
Where the book falls apart for me is that, aside from actively being in a select few, narrowly scoped careers, the book says the best way to "do good" is to earn as much money as possible with the goal of giving part of your earnings or influence as many people as possible to effect change by being in a "prestigious" position.
I have a problem with this because the very people who strive to make lots of money and attain positions of influence contribute an outsized portion to the global problems presented in this book. Also, those people have a vested interest in keeping the status quo of the global caste system. And this book is basically telling people to be like them.
Yes, it's not exactly the same - the book tells people to make lots of money or attain positions of power so they can effect change with donations or their prestigious position, but this book is still perpetuating and participating in the system that created these global problems in the first place. At its core 80,000 Hours is a book written by an elitist for elitists. War and pillaging other nations started with elitist thinking - "We're better than them so we deserve to get all their resources." Fast forward a couple centuries and "Now we feel guilty about our incredibly unequal distribution of global wealth so we'll write books funneling people into high-paying careers so they can send part of it over to these poorer countries."
It's more so a bandaid than anything.
I don't know if making money is the best way to do good. I think teaching people to go for money might cause more harm than good. I don't know if increasing human population is inherently good.
What about increasing the number of people to pursue innately human and gratifying endeavors like making art and creating music, increasing the quality of humans instead of the quantity, teaching people to live in peace and be satisfied with what they need not what they want, and teaching people to think for themselves?
To be fair, this is all outside the scope of this book. And the book did have a short disclaimer midway through about your own definition of social impact possibly differing from theirs, and values like justice and equality not being the focus of this book. Hence, 3 stars because the book really is useful, but my own moral qualms were kind of getting in the way with digesting its advice.