What do you think?
Rate this book
Schopenhauer
Originally published in 1909. Author: Thomas Whittaker Language: English Keywords: Philosophy Many of the earliest books, particularly those dating back to the 1900s and before, are now extremely scarce and increasingly expensive. Obscure Press are republishing these classic works in affordable, high quality, modern editions, using the original text and artwork.
- GenresPhilosophy
100 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1909
22 people are currently reading
23 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
July 18, 2024
This is an advanced introduction to the work of Schopenhauer. The reader is expected have already read Schopenhauer in some detail. Also, it would help to have read in Buddhism widely.
Some notable quotes:
“Schopenhauer’s philosophy is in its outcome a doctrine of redemption from sin.” “As he is accustomed to insist, his final ethical doctrine coincides with that of all of the religions that aim, for their adepts or their elect, at deliverance from “this evil world.” Interesting observation if in fact the world is evil, as he says.
“He was a temperamental pessimist, feeling from the first the trouble of existence, and here he finds the deepest motive for the desire to become clear about it. He saw in the world, what we he felt in himself, a vain effort after ever new objects of desire which give no permanent satisfaction; in this view, becoming predominant, determined not indeed all the ideas of his philosophy, but its general complexion as a philosophy of redemption.”
Schopenhauer seemed to think that if in the pursuit and the achievement of our goals we did not find permanence, then they were in fact, not worth pursuing at all. Why think that though? Was he not aware of inertia, and the processes of natural decay and decline? Why think they did not affect him? Do we not have to eat and relieve ourselves every day? And shave and clean ourselves?
And why look on boredom as some kind of metaphysical state that thus condemns all pursuits?
Whittaker observes that seeing the poor of Europe in many of the cities he traveled through with his parents in his youth left him despondent. Yet, Arthur never showed any interest in doing any thing to help, except to argue that others must lift that load.
Some notable quotes:
“Schopenhauer’s philosophy is in its outcome a doctrine of redemption from sin.” “As he is accustomed to insist, his final ethical doctrine coincides with that of all of the religions that aim, for their adepts or their elect, at deliverance from “this evil world.” Interesting observation if in fact the world is evil, as he says.
“He was a temperamental pessimist, feeling from the first the trouble of existence, and here he finds the deepest motive for the desire to become clear about it. He saw in the world, what we he felt in himself, a vain effort after ever new objects of desire which give no permanent satisfaction; in this view, becoming predominant, determined not indeed all the ideas of his philosophy, but its general complexion as a philosophy of redemption.”
Schopenhauer seemed to think that if in the pursuit and the achievement of our goals we did not find permanence, then they were in fact, not worth pursuing at all. Why think that though? Was he not aware of inertia, and the processes of natural decay and decline? Why think they did not affect him? Do we not have to eat and relieve ourselves every day? And shave and clean ourselves?
And why look on boredom as some kind of metaphysical state that thus condemns all pursuits?
Whittaker observes that seeing the poor of Europe in many of the cities he traveled through with his parents in his youth left him despondent. Yet, Arthur never showed any interest in doing any thing to help, except to argue that others must lift that load.
Displaying 1 of 1 review