In general it's a good read, but I've got some things that really ruin it for me.
The smaller problem is the love "triangle". Liam's convinced he's not good enough for the MC, nothing new here. He decides that she deserves a good husband, so he encourages and tries to help his "rival". My problem is, he just saw her firmly reject this poor guy's marriage proposal. He knows she is not interested in this man at all, she considers him a brother and was made uncomfortable by his declaration of love. It's also pretty obvious that this guy isn't really a good match for her, he adores her, but doesn't really understand her.
And yet Liam decides to teach him what to do to woo her. It was kind of uncomfortable to read. Isn't she allowed to know for herself if a man is acceptable or not? If this was a guy she didn't know very well and she simply didn't consider him because she's keeping herself for her impossible crush, it would be different. Liam could very well try to make her see and consider other men he thinks would suit her better than himself. But that's not the case. She knows this guy very well, he's a friend and a sort of brother. Trying to push her towards him even after she dumped him felt a bit patronizing... Her sister doesn't help. She tells her that of course she shouldn't marry someone she doesn't love, but right after tells her to at least try it out and what a good man he is and how everyone would like the match and maybe she could change her mind etc. From personal experience, it's really irritating and frustrating when other people try to change how you feel about someone or something, or worse, try to convince you that you could feel differently if you just tried, so this really felt bad to me. Really bad. It's one thing to try and help someone to keep their options open, see alternatives, etc, or in this case, remind Wink that Liam isn't the only man in the world. It's another to push her toward the one man she already knows well and has already refused.
The thing that really really killed this book for me though was the repetition of stupid old stereotypes regarding women's fashion and society.
I'm sick and tired of the old "corsets are devices of repression to keep women in their place and stop them from actually doing stuff" propaganda. They were not. Ladies could play sports with corsets on and go on hunting rides. Working class women did everything we do today and a lot more, including hard jobs many of us can't even imagine doing without modern commodities, and they wore corsets. They were the bras of the time, in a sense. And, if properly fitted, they were (are) really comfortable.
Sure, some extremely fashionable ladies were into tight lacing, and that IS uncomfortable and makes it difficult to actually move around. But they were the extreme. We don't all dress like some celebrity at a gala, do we? And even they wear more comfortable clothes during the day.
So in a story like this, I could understand the lady complaining about her evening party corset, as it would be tighter to be fashionable and the dress in general would be more restricting, for show rather than comfort, but in general everyday life, when she dresses more conveniently, she wouldn't have a problem even using her sword.
This is a recurring theme in all this series, but in the previous one it was just a comment here and there and I could ignore it. In this one though it's much more pronounced and there is actually a point when the main characters talk about it explicitly. It really spoiled all my fun. And made me lose all respect for the character. Really, you are a genius, the only thing keeping you back are the prejudices of society toward women's intellect, and you decide to blame corsets for it? Corsets and dresses are somehow linked to the queen (and a lot of society in general) being against the suffrage movement? How????
I know it's a small thing, and this is not exactly a historical novel, but I still think if you want to set your books in a certain time frame, you should get a bit of real insight into it, rather than repeating stereotypes created afterwards.
Also, one of the points of this series is the idea of women getting recognition as rational intelligent beings in a Victorian society and fighting for education and equal treatment.
I think suggesting that wearing corsets (and dresses in general) was a part of what kept women back from equality is very demeaning towards the real women of the time who faced real discrimination, the ones with hard jobs, and the ones who managed to actually do great things. While wearing corsets. (like Lady Lovelace and Florence Nightingale, whom the author loves so much).
(By the way, YouTube is pretty full of videos showing and explaining historical fashion, and women actually wearing it, so it's not like it would require much research to get proper info....)