"An Echo of Murder" had highs and lows, hence the 3 star rating. It seems to me that Anne Perry's characters, especially those in the Monk series, tend to verge on hysteria. This trait coupled with a nauseating amount of repetition has me contemplating a break from the series, if not stopping altogether. Add to that I just don't like the character of Monk and the temptation to quit increases. Hester is the only character I still truly care about anymore and she will be the reason I read the next book, if I do. The impending sense of doom which permeates this series was never present with such intensity in the Pitt series (which I like much better, though the first half of the series is better than the second). And the Daniel Pitt series is encouraging thus far. I just hope it doesn't go off the rails at some point. The Monk series has never been as good, in my personal opinion.
Again, Ms. Perry makes careless mistakes regarding timeline, etc. with her characters. In book 23, Hester's elder brother Charles makes a reappearance. Here is a rundown of the discrepancies regarding Hester's brothers. In book 1, Hester's younger brother George died in the Crimea. In book 3, his name is changed to James. In books 15, 16 and 17 the living brother's name is James and the one who died is either George or Charles. In book 9, the living brother is Charles, I think. Or is it James? Is it any wonder I can't keep it straight since the author can't seem to. And it seemed very odd and unrealistic how easily Hester and Charles resume their relationship, talking to each other as if nine years hadn't passed, especially since their parting had been somewhat acrimonious. Why does Hester feel completely at fault for the break in her relationship with Charles? In previous books where he's appeared, he's never acted in a kind or friendly manner toward her. He is condescending, at best. In fact, in "Sins of the Wolf" when Hester was in prison for a crime she did not commit, he refused to even visit her and get her version of events. Of course, complete and unrealistic changes in character seem to be the norm with Anne Perry (Rathbone's ex-wife, Margaret, and Charles' late wife, Imogen, are only two examples).
Another error involves Monk's past. Not many people know about his memory loss, a fact which Anne Perry brings up. However, it is stated only Hester, Rathbone and Hooper know the truth. Um, I'm pretty sure Runcorn guessed at one point and Monk admitted the truth.
For all the times Monk pats himself on the book about being such a "brilliant" detective, he sure comes off as stupid with a great degree of regularity. Once we realize Haldane murdered Fodor, it's absurdly obvious who killed the other three men. Only one person beside Monk, Hooper and Hyde had intimate knowledge of the details of the original murder scene. Dobokai. Monk initially dismisses him as the killer because he has an alibi for Fodor's murder. Yet when realizing someone else killed the other three victims, it takes forever for Monk to realize having an alibi for the first murder doesn't absolve Dobokai of the other three. And, as always, Hester is really the one who thinks up the angle to solve the case. I tell you, if it weren't for Hester, Monk would have unsolved cases piled up on his desk, proving he's not as brilliant as he thinks. If not for Hester, this series would be a total wash.
I believe the main reason for the re-entrance of Charles into the story and his unbelievably quick reconciliation with Hester is the introduction of his ward, Candace. No doubt, she is going to be a love interest for Scuff/Will fairly soon. Is Perry going to end the Monk series eventually and start a new series featuring Scuff/Will, as she did with the Pitt series and their son Daniel? We'll see.
With previous books in this series, I've listed the unusual names Ms. Perry has unearthed. I'm skipping that this time around since all the unusual names are Hungarian and, thus, not necessarily unusual in Hungary. Not really any unusual English names to mention. Maybe next time.