Michael Bay is planning to direct the film of this book. Yes, Pearl Harbor, Transformers, explosions-as-narrative, scantily-clad-girls-and-big-robots Michael Bay. This is indicative of the level of subtlety displayed by Time Salvagers, a novel that isn’t solving humanity’s most pressing questions, or exploring the boundaries of narrative fiction.
Of course, subtlety isn’t everything, and if you’re looking for a straightforward and entertaining read Time Salvagers could be your ticket, providing you’re prepared to look past some clunky writing and some flux-capacitor level clichés.
The basic concept is one I like- the future is a wrecked, resource-scarce dystopia far past humanity's technological prime. In order to keep colonies on the Jovian moons, Mars, etc. going Chronmen- trained, heavily armed operators who can travel back in time - range through history, salvaging resources and energy sources from places where their absences won't be missed (the reactor of a sinking battleship, for example, or logs from a forest that is about to burn down). All Chronmen work for a neutral agency that is regularly hired by a fairly stock-standard group of Evil Dystopia Corporations (Could we start calling them EDCs? They are so, so common in SF) and are policed by even more heavily armed auditors, who enforce strict time laws and work to capture or kill agents who attempt to desert their duty and flee into the past. As you can imagine, looting the past for salvage is a stressful, dangerous job made worse by the fact that humanity's history is so much better than the miserable present that the Chronmen return to, and the suicide rate in the trade is massive.
James Griffin-Mars has traveled to hundreds of historic disasters where he has looted useful resources then left the people relying on them to die. He's a burnt out wreck, and is close to suicide, until he breaks the most important time law of all and sets his life on a new and dangerous trajectory, pitting himself against his old employer. Of course, there is a corporate conspiracy to be uncovered, and a love interest, and a chance to save the earth, which the corporations have turned into a ruined ball of brown muck.
You've seen these plot developments before, and the execution isn't great here. The writing is occasionally clunky, and tends towards exposition- there is a great deal of 'tell' rather than show. The characters are also pretty clichéd- the burnt out, alcoholic operative who rebels against a corrupt system, the pretty, idealistic scientist type that he falls for, and who loves him back for little discernible reason, the stick-up-the-ass by-the-rules enforcer, etc. The narrative very rarely opts for a character that confounds expectations, and often engineers some pretty unlikely outcomes between its cast, such as two very different, rival characters settling their difference in the course of an off-screen walk up some stairs.
Despite all this, the story hums along quickly and I found myself enjoying it, if occasionally skipping over the more dull exposition-y bits or Griffin-Mars's annoying flashbacks to the people he has lost/abandoned throughout his career. Some of the tech is cool- Chronmen are armed with a force shield/projector called an 'exo', that they can use to create weaponized force-tentacles of a strength that can crush a spaceship, and Chu smashes out the battle scenes, constantly putting Griffin-Mars on the edge of death as he cuts through enemies, falling buildings, crashing ships, and sundry other explosion-y scenarios.
Time Salvager reminds me of some golden/silver era sci-fi, such as Robert Sheckley's The Status Civilisation in that it follows a simple, linear plot line with no unreliable narrator or other such storytelling baubles. Compared to some of the work that has been done by writers such as Ada Palmer and Iain Banks Chu's novel is pretty vanilla, but if you close your critical eye you can get caught up in a pacey, simple story that moves from A to B with no detours.
This book will make a great Michael Bay film, and if your tastes tend towards his kinetic, broad-strokes style you'll probably love it.
2.5 stars.