Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Sorghum & Steel

Rate this book

Unknown Binding

3 people are currently reading
54 people want to read

About the author

Chuang Collective

4 books23 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (14%)
4 stars
3 (42%)
3 stars
3 (42%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
Profile Image for Fei.
544 reviews
March 18, 2018
Academic style writing on pre and post communist revolution China, with some first person narratives/interviews of workers. some interesting insights on how and why organized movements came to be and what is on the horizon for workers.
Profile Image for Jesse.
147 reviews56 followers
September 21, 2025
I'm sympathetic to their political orientation, but often found myself annoyed at their methodological stances, eg. non-mode of production thesis, China was not a nation, identification of the Chinese proletariat under socialism solely with "proto-proletarian temporaries, rusticates, apprentices and worker-peasants," and some other things that seemed straight out of the Endnotes Collective. These might be bold and useful, but often felt half-baked.

I also thought that they emphasized economic aspects too much — I'd have preferred more political history. They tended towards a vulgar materialism that viewed all political struggle within the party as a mere "epiphenomenon" to the economic developments. These economic developments then were viewed as both contingent (not following necessarily from any teleology) but also deterministic, not influenced by party ideology.

I do think that the heavy description of economic stratification, rural/urban divides, gender & seniority-based privileges, informal vs formal labor recruitment, is very valuable, although almost more as a suggestion for what we ought to be investigating about the present-day than for what it says about China. Pretty hard to use their writing-style for the present, though, since it relied on so much retrospective economic data not available to actors at the time.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.