This coffee table book has many shark photos from throughout the acclaimed underwater photographer Brian Skerry's career. The book is structured around chapters focusing on Great White, Tiger, Shortfin Mako, and Oceanic Whitetip sharks that are bookended by introductory and conclusion chapters. National Geographic (NatGeo) journalists Glenn Hodges and Erik Vance contribute chapter content as well as Skerry, with Skerry being the official editor.
There are great and powerful photos in here, but the writing style is more for those at the high school reading level and above rather than at the middle school level. This was also published in 2017, so although it's a great starting point, shark enthusiasts will then need to search elsewhere to access the most updated species listing, fishing regulation, and conservation effort information. Which is a good thing! Just important to recognize a book's limitation; this cannot be your only source by which you try to understand these sharks.
I LOVE the full 2 page infographic spread, featuring a SCUBA diver and 13 sharks, complete with size and tooth shape references, scientific names, species status, diet preferences, a cladogram with morphological traits that reveal how different shark types are related, as well as water column depth ranges to their habitat distributions. What a nexus of art and information! That spread needs to be printed on a larger scale and displayed for every shark enthusiast's quick reference. Best part of the whole book.
This book has extremely important messaging, but as someone who has worked in the publishing industry, I could tell that this took low levels of effort to produce. Many of the photo descriptions are repetitive, implying there was little attention given to the order or rad-through effect these images have on the overall work before the manuscript was sent to print. Glenn Hodges and Erik Vance's chapters had previously been published as NatGeo magazine articles, so were they even involved in putting this product together and do they receive any royalties from its success, or is this NatGeo capitalizing on what shark content they already had copyright permissions to reprint? It's 2023 and NatGeo still seems to be more science and conservation forward in its shark content than the Discovery Channel, but I will be keeping a very scrutinous eye on their messaging because I care a LOT about the ethical study of and advocacy for sharks.