I’m not a Republican, and I have no love for the Republican party. I have no love for the Democratic party, either, but I am somewhat less disgusted with them than I am with the party of Donald Trump, Roy Moore, and Mitch McConnell. How a sleaze-bag, a pedophile, and a weasel got so far up the chain of command in a party that used to be somewhat respectable (it was long before my time, I can assure you) will remain one of those enduring mysteries.
That’s not to say that I can’t respect individual Republicans. Anymore, respectable politicians on either side of the aisle are extremely rare birds. One can almost say that they are endangered species, but they nevertheless exist. I still honestly believe that.
Former Republican Congressman Chris Gibson, I would like to believe, is one of those rare birds. A former decorated Army Colonel who served several tours of duty in places like Iraq and Kosovo, Gibson ran for the U.S. House of Representatives---New York’s 19th District in 2010 and won against a Democratic incumbent. He was then re-elected twice. A strong proponent of term limits, Gibson chose not to run for a fourth term. He is now a professor of American Foreign Policy at Williams College.
It takes a lot to impress me. Seriously. I’m not the type who gets weak-kneed when someone says that they were in the military. That alone isn’t impressive. Admirable, yes, as I understand that it takes a certain temperament and wherewithal to even join the military. What impresses me is what a person accomplishes and learns from his experience. Gibson is the recipient of a Purple Heart, an honor bestowed on those men and women who are wounded or killed in action. Still not totally impressed, although I certainly give the man his deserved respect, and I thank him for his service.
What impresses me is an anecdote he tells in the book about a situation in which he and his men solved a very hair-trigger situation in a battle-zone without resulting in any deaths. Gibson is not the type of veteran who brags about his kills. He laments them. That, to me, is impressive and truly respectable.
I’m also not impressed that he is a devout Christian. That means nothing to me, as I know plenty of so-called “Christians” who are atrocious douchebags. Likewise, I know plenty of atheists who I look up to and admire for being morally upstanding. Just saying that one is a Christian doesn’t get me all squishy in my pants crotch like it does many people I know. One has to prove that one is a Christian, mainly by doing things that are actually Christian.
Without knowing Gibson’s heart and mind, I know one thing that impresses me about his resume: he beat a sitting Democratic incumbent with 55% of the votes. Alone, that’s not super-impressive. The fact that he won re-election twice is telling, however. It tells me that he was a straight-shooter and someone that his constituents believed in enough to keep him around for three terms and may have kept him for a fourth if he hadn’t bowed out.
The fact that he refused to run again is impressive, given the nature of most politicians today, who will literally say and do anything to keep their positions of power.
It’s also kind of infuriating, because Gibson seems like one of those rare politicians who actually gave a shit about his constituents and didn’t seem to do things that were motivated by self-interest or lobbyists.
Gibson’s short book, “Rally Point”, details his personal five-point agenda for getting the country out of the horrendous quagmire in which it currently resides. I don’t pretend to agree with all of his points. In fact, I actively disagree, vociferously, with at least two of them.
But that doesn’t mean I don’t think he has important things to say or that his points aren’t valid.
One thing I pride myself on is an open mind. I believe in things strongly, but I am not so rigid in my beliefs that I can’t open myself up to the possibility that I may be wrong. Indeed, I may be wrong about a lot of things. That is why I read a lot, because I actually enjoy---believe it or not---having some of my world-views shaken or some of my long-held beliefs shattered. I’m pretty sure that’s how true learning happens.
It seems to me (and I could be wrong; I could be totally misreading him) that Gibson probably feels the same way. He is clearly a man who is strong in his own beliefs, but he seems to be willing to want an honest, non-judgmental, free exchange of ideas.
“Rally Point” is worth reading if only to convince yourself that sanity and decorum and ethics still exists somewhere in Washington, D.C. There is still hope. For instilling that hope---an impressive feat---I thank you, Mr. Gibson.