What do you think?
Rate this book


Although he styled himself 'His Highness', adopted the court ritual of his royal predecessors, and lived in the former royal palaces of Whitehall and Hampton Court, Oliver Cromwell was not a king - in spite of the best efforts of his supporters to crown him.
Yet, as David Horspool shows in this illuminating new portrait of England's Lord Protector, Cromwell, the Puritan son of Cambridgeshire gentry, wielded such influence that it would be a pretence to say that power really lay with the collective. The years of Cromwell's rise to power, shaped by a decade-long civil war, saw a sustained attempt at the collective government of England; the first attempts at a real Union of Britain; the beginnings of empire; a radically new solution to the idea of a national religion; atrocities in Ireland; and the readmission to England of the Jews, a people officially banned for over three and a half centuries. At the end of it, Oliver Cromwell had emerged as the country's sole ruler: to his enemies, and probably to most of his countrymen, his legacy looked as likely to last as that of the Stuart dynasty he had replaced.
124 pages, Kindle Edition
Published February 23, 2017
The issue of the prosecution of the war was a wider one for parliament than the dispute between two of its commanders. But it would become typical of Oliver that his personal troubles became inextricable from the nation's, and that the solution to them was a change in national policy, rather than a mere alteration in individual circumstances. This link between one man's personality and the direction of the nation is one with which we are familiar when dealing with monarchs, and occasionally with great nobles. Cromwell is the first commoner to have made the same connection. What people call greatness can often be found to lie in the extent to which a person can involve others in the drama of their lives, and persuade the public of the importance for them of the fortunes of one individual. By that measure, Oliver Cromwell was beginning to be a great man.
Although Cromwell had run out of patience with Charles - 'this man, against whom the Lord hath witnessed' - he stopped short, unlike his son-in-law Henry Ireton, of the conclusion that this must mean the king's death.
He continued to look for a different solution to the problem, including offering the king a chance to stay on the throne as little more than a figurehead, or to abdicate, both of which Charles rejected. Cromwell may have expected Charles to do so, but this does not mean that the offer was purely cosmetic: plenty of his comrades had no such qualms.