Rządzenie żywymi to IX tom wykładów Michela Foucaulta w College de France i zarazem tom szczególny. Wykłady w roku akademickim 1979-1980 Foucault poświęcił bowiem teoretycznemu i historycznemu opracowaniu pojęcia "reżimu prawdy" - pojęcia, które wyznaczało główną oś jego zainteresowań podczas całego okresu pracy w College de France. Angażując problematykę reżimów prawdy do analizowania technik i procedur prowadzenia ludzi, czyli rządzenia żywymi, Foucault śledzi kształtowanie się metod badania sumienia w epoce chrześcijańskiej. Od wczesnochrześcijańskich koncepcji wyznań i ich różnicy względem praktyk starożytnych po średniowieczne reguły zakonne, Foucault przygląda się, w jaki sposób praktyki wyznania grzechów i rachunku sumienia wymuszały mówienie prawdy o sobie, przyznawania się do swoich błędów oraz uznawania samego siebie - wobec Boga i ludzi - za grzesznika. Interesuje go związek między mówieniem prawdy o sobie i angażowaniem ludzi w stosunki o charakterze etycznym i politycznym - zobowiązywania się do podtrzymywania swojego stanowiska czy też podporządkowywania się autorytetom. Badania Foucaulta doprowadziły go do postawienia pytania, które nie straciło nic ze swojej palącej aktualności: dlaczego na gruncie naszej kultury od rządzonych wymaga się aktów posłuszeństwa i uległości polegających na mówieniu prawdy o sobie.
Paul-Michel Foucault was a French philosopher, historian of ideas, writer, political activist, and literary critic. Foucault's theories primarily address the relationships between power and knowledge, and how they are used as a form of social control through societal institutions. Though often cited as a structuralist and postmodernist, Foucault rejected these labels. His thought has influenced academics, especially those working in communication studies, anthropology, psychology, sociology, criminology, cultural studies, literary theory, feminism, Marxism and critical theory. Born in Poitiers, France, into an upper-middle-class family, Foucault was educated at the Lycée Henri-IV, at the École Normale Supérieure, where he developed an interest in philosophy and came under the influence of his tutors Jean Hyppolite and Louis Althusser, and at the University of Paris (Sorbonne), where he earned degrees in philosophy and psychology. After several years as a cultural diplomat abroad, he returned to France and published his first major book, The History of Madness (1961). After obtaining work between 1960 and 1966 at the University of Clermont-Ferrand, he produced The Birth of the Clinic (1963) and The Order of Things (1966), publications that displayed his increasing involvement with structuralism, from which he later distanced himself. These first three histories exemplified a historiographical technique Foucault was developing called "archaeology". From 1966 to 1968, Foucault lectured at the University of Tunis before returning to France, where he became head of the philosophy department at the new experimental university of Paris VIII. Foucault subsequently published The Archaeology of Knowledge (1969). In 1970, Foucault was admitted to the Collège de France, a membership he retained until his death. He also became active in several left-wing groups involved in campaigns against racism and human rights abuses and for penal reform. Foucault later published Discipline and Punish (1975) and The History of Sexuality (1976), in which he developed archaeological and genealogical methods that emphasized the role that power plays in society. Foucault died in Paris from complications of HIV/AIDS; he became the first public figure in France to die from complications of the disease. His partner Daniel Defert founded the AIDES charity in his memory.
I guess this is really important for Foucault's development, or maybe there's a much larger audience for explication of early Christian theories of baptism than I had suspected, but this is wildly over-rated here on Goodreads. The basic idea remains compelling: when did 'truth' become what we think of as 'truth'? But I'd skip this unless you're writing a dissertation on him, which I, for the record, am not.
“The Christian has the deep truth within himself and he is yoked to this deep secret, indefinitely bent over to it and indefinitely constrained to show the other the treasure that his work, thought, attention, conscience, and discourse ceaselessly draw it from it” (p. 313).
‘In any case, there is a kinship between being and the soul and the truth is nothing other than the manifestation of the soul’s kinship with being.’ p. 144
‘We find in Saint Paul (...): “it is by the law that we know sin.” Should this not be understood in the following way: it is the law, the very existence of a law dividing good and evil, that reveals sin?’ p. 183
‘Ancient supplication operates as the transfer of obligation through the manifestation of misfortune.’ p. 213
‘(...) that even in these most holy figures, even in those closest tot the truth there was a blind spot (...). They are unable to know exactly what they must do, for they do not really know what they can do and they do not really know what they can do because basically they do not know what they are.’ p. 294
‘It is not the value of things that one must recognize, it is the secrets of conscience that must be deciphered.’ p. 297
In Christian examination (...). What is in question is not the truth of my idea; it is the truth of myself who has an idea. It is not the question of truth of what I think, but the question of the truth of I who thinks.’ p. 303
‘(...) one no longer needs to be king, to have killed one’s father, married one’s mother, and ruled over the plague to be forced to discover the truth of oneself. It is enough to be anyone.’ p. 311
‘If you are obliged to tell the truth it is because, without knowing it, despite everything, there’s a bit of Oedipus in you too.’ p. 312
És massa és massa. Sempre amb Foucault es redescobreix, es reafirma, que cada element que contemplen, que cada acció que duem a terme té una rel històrica, que res en la raó és natural sinó històrica i socialment produït. I que aquesta història és sempre una lluita de voluntats, el desig de les voluntats de dominar, d'imposar, en aquest cas l'estructura dogma-confessió cristiana com a dispositiu de subjecció del subjectum, obligat als actes de fe, obligat a l'exploració de si i a l'enunciació de la seva veritat. Molt bo.
Como suele ocurrir con los seminarios y textos de Foucault que se enfocan más en el polo "saber" del poder-saber, no es lo que más me interesa. Aún así, es muy preciso, más lineal que otros seminarios, y contiene algunas reflexiones muy interesantes sobre la diferencia entre el enfoque foucaltiano y el marxista.
This lecture series is particularly great if you are interested in Foucault's examination of selfhood with regards to early Christian and ancient Greek philosophy. This is a great complementary text to his Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth.
Foucault demuestra nuevamente el poder de realizar construcciones de Estado desde una óptica social... El gobierno de los vivos es un libro que no puede faltar en la librería
Following the lectures on bio politics and the rise of neoliberalism in 1978-1979, Foucault turned his attention to the development of Christian subjectivation. These lectures begin with a Greece and Rome and a detailed explication of Sophocles' Oedipus. It then shifts to early Christianity, the conventions of baptism, penitence, asceticism, and monasticism. Foucault traces these early innovations to the more full-blown desire for self-surveillance and confession.