This book consists of essays and a couple of interviews on Eva Hesse. I liked the interviews but had forgotten or just realized how art theory/art criticism could be word salad to be scarfed down because its perceived to be good because it looks pretty or because you’re starving. In particular the essay “Hesse’s Desiring Machines” was unreadable for me though honestly I’m not sure if I understood the other essays either. I’d forgotten how much philosophy you need to know in general, as well as vocabulary you don’t normally use to truly understand what you’re reading.
I know this review sounds negative, but I actually found a little growth of understanding of Hesse’s work that I didn’t have before the read, and feel like if I slowed down and took the time to work through what was being said I might learn a good deal more or at least be able to pinpoint what I disagreed with. That being said I don’t have a solid enough understanding of what I read to rate it.