Quick, breviloquent, pithy, memorable, witty, and most importantly 'useful' (in a very narrow sense of the word), there are many curmudgeonly adjectives attributable to this guide. Curmudgeon wrote this book not to teach us about law, but to establish a systematic framework for approaching the fundamentally unteachable practice of the legal industry. It's a learned game, a dirty battle, a frighteningly fragile race to find out the winners. There are no rules, only rulers at the end of the day.
This viewpoint is of course inherently narrow and not encompassing of our actual reality; and that's not the point. Rather, it is an intentional mental register that Curmudgeon turns on when it's go time. When it's time to show up and get results. In an argument, which is the primary function of a lawyer on behalf of their client, Curmudgeon chides us to use active verbs: 'be more persuasive' transforms into 'persuade better'; 'be faster' transforms into 'respond faster'; 'be confident' transforms into 'act confidently'; you get the point. However, if you've noticed, I use a lot of 'to be' verbs in this review. Why is that? Because I'm not engaged in that argumentative mode right now, and I don't want [to be]. Why not? Because I am writing a review: I wish to formulate interesting takeaways I had from the book, to reflect and connect the dots, to linger on intuitions and reactions. I am on a different intellectual mode when writing this reflection. This review would most definitely not constitute an argumentative essay I might expect a college professor to assign me in a classroom setting, and it shouldn't. There are different contexts for different types of writing, and I am disciplining myself to practice multiple writing styles. I want to practice writing reviews; I wish to continue practicing to write argumentative essays; I need to persistently train my email-writing correspondence for my job. One thing Curmudgeon absolutely nails is the essence of habitual learning, initially formalized under Aristotle if I recall correctly. Under this system, virtue can be reckoned as the net sum of a set of habitualized practices and disciplines. The aesthetic of writing towards the procurement of virtue is the process of writing per se, with no viable substitutions. There isn't any other way to get better at writing or being a lawyer; just do. 'Practice makes better' - page 85 of the book. Great line.
As I have said with my previous book on the history of cryptocurrency, this book is inevitably a product of its time. It is quite rough on the edges with regards to technological innovations; having been written in 2006, this is completely understandable and makes for some rough, laughable, and truly curmudgeonly talking points with regards to email correspondence and technology usage during meetings. Times have changed, remote work is everywhere, efficiency has increased, things are different in good and bad ways.
Nevertheless, I got super inspired by the last chapter on how to expand business and potentially start your own practice as a litigator in your own right. How do you do it? Interact with the legal world: contribute, work, put your name out there, talk, meet, learn, love, respect, argue, disagree, shout, fight. There are a bunch of lovely suggestions that I will most DEFINITELY be coming back to refer to later on when I start implementing those suggestions into my lawyerly routine at some point.
This book is clearly made with a bunch of love and heart. It inspired me to write more, to read more, to be aggressive, to follow what I love, to get involved, to be part of the community, and to produce good work. Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law was a great read. 4.25 stars.