2.5 stars.
As someone who both appreciates feeling feminine / attractive, and also considers themselves a feminist, (as apparently, as you’ll learn in this book, those two things oppose each other somehow), the premise of this book instantly appealed to me. Two girls switch their styles of clothing. One of the girls, ZiZi, prides herself on her traditionally feminine appearance, and flirts a lot, and apparently this makes her more of a girl. The other, Loretta, doesn’t wear makeup, and likes science, and apparently this makes her less of a girl.
The main issue I have with this book, predictably, is that it revolves around the concept that being “feminine” or even being “a girl” boils down to what kind of clothes you wear. Loretta is described as looking or being “androgynous” or “gender neutral”, which isn’t so bad considering those things are both presentation words, not gender words - but the entire concept that BEING A GIRL revolves around your presentation and behaviour is just odd. The only thing you need to do to be a girl is to be a girl. To identify as a girl. Plus it raises the obligatory point that there’s no such thing as girl’s clothes or men’s clothes. Which also begs, what is femininity, and masculinity? But i digress. I could do this forever. (I just might. Just not here).
Also, why is the, quote, “unisex” look t-shirts and trousers? Up until recently, they were men’s clothes. It was only because women fought for the right to wear trousers that they’re now sold widely. If men wear skirts, they’re considered to be gay, or not men. But nobody sniffs at a woman wearing jeans. I just find it ironic how men’s everything is considered neutral, the ‘normal’ version of stuff, and women’s is the unusual or additional version.
So, like I said, my main issue with this book isn’t the use of “non gender specific” relating to toys that aren't dolls, it is that NO toys are gender specific, including dolls. The book seems to be written from a very cis feminist perspective, dissecting the world into 2 sexes, 2 genders. In reality there’s no such thing as men's clothes or women's clothes, and there are many other sexes and genders besides. Plus, why are “men’s” things considered non gender specific and “women’s” always aren’t?! Like men are the default humans and women are something extra on the side.
Also, the part about women’s and men’s brains being proven to be the same literally isn’t true. There’s a stark difference. You can tell someone’s gender identity (not their sex - the way they IDENTIFY) by looking at their brain, whether boy, girl, or neither.
And then there's the obligatory issue of Zizi implying Lou is more of a girl for having crushes, which is offensive to asexual girls, and also implies that any other gender who has crushes is a girl. There's also a possible implication that her fancying a boy is what makes her a girl, so I needn’t explain how that’s offensive to gay girls, while simultaneously implying that gay boys are girls.
Lou actually has a very sexist ideology by believing that femininity (if we're going to pretend that femininity, in terms of binary sex stereotypes, exists) inherently compromises one's worth.
Why is Loretta implying moisturiser is a traditionally feminine product? I know i could say this about any of her examples, but really, moisturiser? Does she not use moisturiser?! Everyone has SKIN, even feminists and men.
About the book itself, and not the story: I found the writing style of this book pretty hard to get into, so much so that I had to read another book halfway through. The punctuation was about as dodgy as it is in most YA. I thought the altered doodles around the names was a nice touch - takes you a couple of chapters to clock it.
I really thought Gabe would end up with Zizi, and Dillon with Lou - just me?
Also, just saying, Dillon's documentary should've totally been edited between clips of Zizi and Lou explaining to the camera what had just happened, e.g. “this was right after I locked my boss in the pantry."
I also wish we found out what happened to Zizi's house, like did the boys start cleaning or did her mum come home to find it a mess?
Obligatory petty complaints aside, this book was okay. I'm not opposed to trying more of Dyan Sheldon's work. I just hate reading feminist takes when they come from this extremely rigid cis point of view. It leaves a lot to be desired.