This was a disappointing book. Admittedly, this book is one of the earlier works by the author, when he still took himself too seriously and felt the need to defend himself as a serious writer. Unfortunately, when an author decides to touch third rails all over the place with offensively leftist political and religious worldviews--he seems particularly hostile to premillennial religious sects, a negative bias I take rather personally--then taking someone seriously means viewing the author with a high degree of irritation and annoyance. Not only that, but the vast majority of these essays are lengthy and frequently mean-spirited. It is as if the early Cahill was trying to be like John McPhee without being humane and seeking to show those he was reporting on in a good light. And so he makes fun of unconventional religious people, mocks the interest in cryptids like Bigfoot in Oregon, and generally portrays himself in a douchey fashion. In fact, the author frames himself in such an unfriendly light that one almost wishes that a wolverine had eaten his leg off, and devoured the rest of him as well. Fortunately, the author's writings did get a lot better as they became shorter and more self-effacing, but this book is definitely a rough beginning.
The essays in this collection, roughly 300 pages total, are divided into five sections. The first section examines jungles of the mind, and it looks at the author's discussions about religion (including cults in California and the survivors of Jonestown in Guyana) as well as politics and ecology. After that the author looks at issues of terror and paradise by trying to discuss the Garden of Eden as well as the search for terror in Montana and the enjoyment of beauty and terror in the Marquesas. After that the author discusses scuba diving, harem fantasies, and the search for sea snakes. Two essays look at monsters and hoaxes (bigfoot and some ice fishing in Wisconsin). Finally, the last series of essays provides some examples of the author's love of travel, including vertical caving, survival games, and a kayak trip down the Ganges River. It is certainly possible to feel envious of the author's travel experiences, especially since they appear to have been on the dime of various magazines, even though the essays reveal that the author's writing abilities need a lot of work.
If one is inclined to read this book charitably, one can say that the bloated and heavy-handed aspect of these essays shows a writer still trying to learn his craft. Fortunately, his writing would get better, but if this had been my first impression of the author's works I might not bother to read much more of it. Fortunately, as is often the case, the author's maladroit take on politics and religion does provide other writers who may happen to read this with a better grip on how not to handle matters of faith and biblical interpretation. And to his credit, the author would go on to write thoughtful and sensitive pieces that do not attempt to paint him as an expert in issues on religion and politics, and even if his political worldview does not noticeably improve, the fact that the author stops taking himself so seriously and frames himself as an incompetent abroad makes his writing a lot easier to take, since one can handle brainless political hot takes from an obvious incompetent far more than someone who takes themselves seriously and expects you to do so as well. As is so often the case in writing, framing matters a great deal in how a work is taken, and these works fail to amuse or impress.