I usually hate the "decolonize your diet" genre - including the eponymous original - because I think they are a load of hooey. To me, the genre indicates a massive insecurity towards the actually-existing history and culture; a load of bad history and mythicization; and a delusion sense of purity and gate-keeping.
Let's be clear - this cookbook is not for most people. It is based on the wild ingredients found in Minnesota and the Dakotas, so for most people this book will be unusable. I, for one, have no idea where I'd find bison meat, fresh acorns, or juniper berries - and even if I did, they'd be specialty items that either need a lot of DIY foraging work or a lot of money. Also if you are vegetarian or don't want red meat, good luck! A lot of the recipes are bison or elk.
I thought I was going to hate this cookbook too - but I read through the whole thing instead of throwing it down in a rage after 20 pages.
Why don't I hate it? There's a few reasons:
1) The author opens this up as a thought experiment - "What did my ancestors eat before the Europeans arrived on our lands?" (p. 3). The author did their research "I started reading everything I could get my hands on and had books shipped directly to me - cookbooks, magazines, research publications - that covered Native American cooking, history, wild foraging, ethnobotany, anything that might provide a glimpse [. . . ]" (p. 4). They even included a bibliography at the end - who's ever heard of a cookbook with references! Even more than a cookbook, this is a thought experiment into what precolonial Lakota food did, or could have, looked like. The author's cookbook is an attempt to actually discover the reality of the past that was and to imagine a present that could be.
2) The author makes a rather important point regarding fry bread. "I'm often asked why we don't have fry bread on the menu or offer a recipe for fry bread in this book [. . . ] Fry bread represents perseverance and pain, ingenuity and resilience [. . . ] Yet frybread continues to high levels of diabetes and obesity that affect nearly one-half of the Native population living on reservations [ . . .] "Frybread has killed more Indians than the federal government," sings rock star Keith Secola [. . . ] Let's update this story with real corn cakes that enfold braised bison or smoked duck, authentic Native food. They taste of the time when we, as a people, were healthy and strong, and of the promise that we can stand up to the foods that have destroyed our health, the forces that have compromised our culture. And our corn cakes are easier to make and far tastier than any fry bread".
I deeply appreciate how much thought the author put into their culinary choices, and justifying these. This is based on genuine concern for existing communities, and the author can justify their choice by history, health, and taste - all important criteria for cookery!
3) There are a few recipes I really do want to try. I want to try the cookies; I want to try making the squash and cranberry soup. I want to try the corn puffs and the dandelion sauce.
Because the ingredients are so inaccessible and so comparatively limited, I cannot call this amazing. Yet, because the author put so much thought and care and research into this - and most importantly, because there are a few recipes I want to try - this book does deserve a 3.
If you read this as a thought experiment, it is very clever and well thought out. If you want to use this as a cookbook, just be aware that if you do not have a bison/elk/juniper berry/maple sugar guy, then you'll have to find some workaround for about 3/4 of the recipes.
UPDATE: I tried making some of the recipes multiple times, and they are absolutely repulsive. I recant my previous praise, and I am docking this down to a 1/5.