Barthelme’s writing is clever and often experimental, each story a trial run at novelty. There is in the experimentation a magpie quality, a gathering up of diverse, queer shiny bits (banalities and commonplaces of genre, conversation, contemporary life, and popular culture) that can produce a strange and intriguing congery. Or sometimes just a sad two-headed sideshow calf. In other words, Barthelme’s restlessness drives him to bold hit-or-miss ventures; but he’s clearly a craftsman, aware of his tools and the medium, playful in an earnest way about how he can make something new and distinctive in the space allotted a short story by, say, O’Henry.
The sense of play is what most appeals to me in Barthelme’s several stories in this collection. The whimsy in “Engineer-Private Paul Klee Misplaces an Aircraft Between Milbershofen and Cambrai, March 1916” makes it my favorite in this collection, because the subject and treatment are a fitting blend of post-modern gravitas and a kind of babe-in-the-woods levity that matches much of Klee’s own work. And there is the sense that it’s still a story, though a peculiar one. “The Genius”, while entertaining for the odd series of brilliant and sometimes disorienting dissonances each of its sections displays, is not properly a story of the O’Henry sort, with beginning, middle, end—though there is irony aplenty, much of it deriving simply from the fact that the so-called “genius” behaves/thinks less like any genius we might conceive.
Other pieces in this collection simply drifted by, not particularly substantial; one, “Traumerie”, put me in mind of poems John Ashbery might have written at the same time (circa 1960). Some others left me scratching my head, wondering what effect was intended; such was the case with “The Rise of Capitalism,” an irreconcilable mix of high and low concepts that tickled the funny bone and/or knitted my brow.
Despite themes that sometimes echoed the collection’s title, and despite stories that sometimes eluded my understanding, I always sensed in these stories their creator’s playfulness/artfulness. As with the Zen koan, which paradox is supposed to produce a disruptive cogitative dissonance and triumphant violation of either/or thinking (a la the Gordian knot), Barthelme’s stories are short enough to visit and revisit for similar piquant epiphanies.