The first 80 pages were quite tedious at times, and took me determined weeks to creep through. But it was DD, and only 300ish pages, so I was determined to finish it. However, hitting page 80, the rest was a downhill ski & I tore through it ravenously over the course of an evening.
The buddhi/satori concept was 10/10, perfectly described & nuanced as though it were truly experienced firsthand. We were at 5 stars for that.
Cedric’s tenacity was endearing. Alya was pretty slick.
I found the self-recrimination and outrage of certain characters compelled to “murder” utterly terrible, actual monstrous murderers to be a bit tiresome & goody-two-shoes. The lawful good alignment can be fairly irritating.
Alya is a brown girl, the cover made her obviously white. Just a side note, not the author’s doing! But the cover image got other things right, so what the hell?
Duty sex…not sure exactly what I think about that. But what I will say is that a lot of the sex dynamics in this felt dated. Felt like 1988 (when it was written - by a generally progressive, egalitarian, conscientious author influenced by some of the assumptions of his era/context like any of us).
Then again, looking at the characters’ ages, the fact in it’s in another time, none of those things are that shocking.
As an aside, DD writes excellent women & there are great women in this book.
Except Alya does change gears on her feelings prettttty quickly, without any clear external catalyst. All the “darling”ing got a bit cloying.
Got a little annoyed, admittedly, over 2 things toward the end, in short succession of one another - 1) all the needless guilt-ridden melodrama over certain dead people, and 2) the jovial tone with which a protagonist reflected on using live animals as target practice, setting them on fire with lasers (gopher, magpie, coyote). Those factors in combination shaved off 2 stars in what was otherwise a good book, and one of those was just for the brief animal line, in particular because it was so clearly seen as wrong to kill homicidal maniacs, but setting a chill bird on fire was totally fine with this guy?? Enough to laugh about in hindsight?
The ending felt a little pollyanna, sappy and slightly rushed, but I would almost never take off a star for that, and definitely not in this case. I would have been more thrilled at the happy ending if I hadn’t started to get irritated with certain morally tedious, anthropocentric characters toward the end, and for this reason, I’m unlikely to read it again.
But Dave Duncan was a damned good writer, and this was still quite an entertaining story.
I really loved the political intrigue & machinations that he is just dazzling at contriving, on par with George RR.