my rating: 1/5
hello, beautiful people of goodreads! today we're going to talk about one of my least favorite books:
SIVAKAMIYIN SABADHAM (ss) aka KALKIYIN KOZHAPPAM.
listen, i had high expectations for this book, because nandini vijayaraghavan (translator) and sriram v (historian and writer; wrote the foreword for part 1) both stated that they think that this book is MUCH, MUCH BETTER than ponniyin selvan (ps). they shared their childhood memories and their fav scenes with the readers, and mrs. vijayaraghavan's passion for translating this story clearly showed. she took a lot of effort and i appreciate that.
what i DON'T appreciate is the book itself.
i don't know what it was that made me feel like this, but i felt like the book was very badly written, and i got so sick of it that i didn't read the final part (tho i looked at the plot in wikipedia, and it disappointed me very much). and it was all because of the characters, who go through NO character development AT ALL.
every good writer knows that the characters don't revolve around the plot, the plot revolves around the characters. it is because of the characters' decisions and choices that the story moves forward - hell, it's the only way we even GET a story. for example: if kaikeyi never used the two boons that she got from dashrath the way she did, then ram would never have gone on exile with sita and lakshman. and if lakshman had never cut off shurpnaka's nose, then ravan would never have kidnapped sita and the war between him and ram would never have happened.
now keep this in mind as we proceed with the review.
ss has 5 main characters:
1. SIVAKAMI (dancer; pallava citizen; female lead/"heroine")
2. NARASIMHA VARMA PALLAVAR aka MAMALLAR (pallava prince; male lead/"hero")
3. PARANJYOTHI (commander of pallava army)
4. SATYASREYA PULIKESI (chalukya king; villain 1)
5. NAGANANDI ADIGAL (mysterious monk; villain 2)
the whole problem with the book lies with these characters (except naganandi, the only character worth reading about in this book and for whom i gave 0.5 stars). at the beginning of the story, sivakami is a beautiful dancer, mamallar is the angry jiang cheng without any of jc's redeeming qualities, paranjyothi is a rustic youth, and pulikesi is the cruel villain. at the end of the story, sivakami is still the beautiful dancer, mamallar is still the angry jiang cheng without any of jc's redeeming qualities, paranjyothi is still the rustic youth, and pulikesi is still the cruel villain. there is NO change AT ALL in their personalities.
let's look at them one by one.
first, paranjyothi. the first mc that we are introduced to. the entire first part is about him (it was literally titled "Paranjyothi's Journey"). he spends his childhood brawling with the other kids in his village like a delinquent (toman vibes anyone?) until he turns 18 and decides that he should do something with his life that doesn't involve brawling. so he goes to the pallava kingdom (paranjyothi grew up in chola nadu) to the monastery of the great saivite monk, thirunavukkarasar. he never reaches the monastery, cuz he meets naganandi along the way and saves a couple of people from a mad elephant.
who were those people? sivakami and her dad.
the entire first part is about him going around to every place imaginable in the south and meeting a dude called vajrabahu (surprise surprise, it's the pallava king) and we are reintroduced to him after an EIGHT MONTH timeskip when we are told that he became the commander of the pallava army AND mamallar's new bestie. WHAAAAAT?!?! come on, kalki! i wanna see this guy kick ass in the battlefield! and i wanna see how this guy became friends with mamallar so easily! (i wonder if it would've been like how vanthiyathevan met arulmozhivarman)
and then there's the fact that after the first part, paranjyothi becomes a side character who only exists as the token "hero friend" and does not contribute to the story at all. WHY?!?! WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU KALKI?!?!
speaking of heroes...
next up is mamallar. as i said before, he's the angry jiang cheng without any of his redeeming qualities. throughout the story, he's either itching to fight in the war or he's madly in love with sivakami. neither of which is particularly wonderful to read.
sometimes, when i was reading the book, i felt like mxtx learnt how not to write jiang cheng from mamallar. because he's just so ANGSTY. like an ultra-stereotypical man. at the start of the book, he was bearable but towards the end, he lost all personality and was simply angry at each and every thing. *sighs*
see, i haven't even written much about him cuz there's nothing about him to write about!
next we have pulikesi, the big, evil Bad Guy. the ruler of the chalukya kingdom, pulikesi is cruel and hates art FOR NO REASON. don't get me wrong, guys. by all means, write a guy who is cruel and hates art. but give him a backstory. why does he hate art so much? was it an event from his past? and was he kinder person in his childhood? if so, what made him the cold, unfeeling person he is today? (think jin guangyao and the darkling: these villains were made, not born)
pulikesi, too, is very one-dimensional. but the thing is, he's been like that since the time he was first introduced. we can excuse pulikesi's characterization, cuz at that time, cruel villains were much more popular than well thought-out villains. (i don't why they're still carrying on with that trend... it's so much interesting to see villains like the darkling and jin guangyao than a stereotype like voldemort or sauron, for example)
and finally we have sivakami. the most horribly written character i have ever seen.
the translator and mr. sriram were singing praises of sivakami in the first part, so i naturally thought there was something to be seen about her. something incredible. however, i was sorely disappointed.
kalki describes sivakami in almost every chapter in the following way:
Ah, Sivakami. The beauty of beauties, the dancer of dancers. The Queen of Dance. Even Thirunavukkarasar was moved to tears by her performance. She is truly the epitome of dance. The way she dances is so spectacular, she must have been taught by the gods themselves. There is no way you cannot be swept into her performances. Her skill deserves to be applauded. There is none more talented than her in the field of dance. She is the God of Dance. If you cannot appreciate her skill as a dancer, then there's something wrong with you. And did I mention she's a dancer?
i kid you not. this is how sivakami is talked about. it's either her dance or how she eMboDieS tHe sPiriT oF tHaMizHaGaM.
this description is good! there's nothing wrong with writing descriptions like this! but it would work BETTER if sivakami was just a random character. but this book is literally all about her. so we reeeeeeally need a bit more personality here, kalki.
but this is not the only problem with sivakami. it's the fact that she acts like a dumb, toxic BITCH. i think people who like this book just like dumb, bitchy, useless women, cuz there's no way anyone could like sivakami otherwise.
sivakami is so air-headed. like who in their right mind would try to jump into a river when the same river is going through a raging tsunami? looks like her dad's choice of letting her grow up in the forest without anyone other than him to talk to was a parenting mistake. then there's the way she treats mamallar. this is the man she fell in love with as a child, this is the man she wants to spend the rest of her life with. and she treats him like mud.
when mamallar makes a move on her, she doesn't reciprocate even though she "loves him with all her heart". at first, it just seemed like she was playing hard to get, but then it just turned out to be toxic and problematic. and then there's her inner monologue/dilemma:
sivakami: mamallar doesn't love me, i'm so SAD *sobs*
also sivakami: this bikshu (monk) says that mamallar doesn't love me, ofc i'm going to believe some sussy monk with obvious ulterior motives over the man i literally grew up with- OH MY GOD, is he talking to paranjyothi?!?! the AUDACITY- i knew he didn't like me, ugh, men are disgusting-
yup. this is her.
and lastly, there's this weird complex that she has. she and her father acknowledge that they're part of the commoners, the civilians, but when sivakami finally does something that contributes to her reputation (standing up for the pallava citizens pulikesi captured), she refuses to do the one thing she can to save them: dance. all she had to do was dance in the streets, and she's immediately like "no i'm too high and mighty for this" for no reason. maybe it was a cultural thing, but it really seemed like sivakami was saying, "i'm superior to you, you are inferior" when she was always like "i'm a commoner".
so in conclusion: don't waste your time and money on this. read ps instead. or stream nerdy by purple kiss so that you can preserve your braincells. bye~!