Gravetter and Wallnau's proven best-seller gives you straightforward instruction, guaranteed accuracy, built-in learning aids, and plenty of real-world examples that will help you understand statistical concepts. The authors take time to explain statistical procedures so that you can go beyond memorizing formulas and gain a conceptual understanding of statistics. The authors also take care to show you how having an understanding of statistical procedures will help you comprehend published findings and will lead you to become a savvy consumer of information. Known for its exceptional accuracy and examples, this text also has a complete supplements package to support your learning.
I found the plot rather scattered and confusing. Half the characters are Greek, which makes it really hard to follow what’s going on and who is who. In particular, I found Pearson, Spearman and LeRegression to be somewhat underdeveloped, even though one might argue they are central to the story. However, I wouldn’t hesitate recommending this book to any student of human relations, since it has a lot of instructive material to offer here.
Even if you've completely forgotten high school math like me, this textbook will catch you up in no time. It really broke statistics down into logical steps with (what I really appreciated) explanations as well as examples.
Great book. I appreciated a lot the way the information presented in here. It starts with a fairly easy topics, and with each chapter becomes more complicated. If you would find yourself lost in it, I bet you skipped the previous chapter, or a part of it. This is a must have book. I rented it, but going to buy in the future.
A very easy to read beginner-level text on statistical and inferential analysis. Had a lot to say about ANOVA, but not as much about what political scientists might in terms of logit and probit models. But it wasn't written for political scientists.
I haven't read any other statistics books, and after this I don't think I will. It made no sense at the end it just seemed like they were mixing words and equations.
I'm still reading this book but my brain is focusing on the fact that chapter 13 made a mistake having nothing to do with statistics. They talk about "poisonous spider bites" as an example. They should have said "venomous spider bites" dumb thing to dwell on I know. But if you bite it and it kills you it's poisonous, if it bites you and you die it's venomous. Sorry my brain is hyper focusing on this.
Man, this textbook is rough. I mean, all math text books are rough, but this one in particular! My professor did a WAY better job teaching me statistics than this book will ever do. This would get 0 stars, if it was allowed.
information was super digestible. i found the examples were spread out really well which helped me to understand the topics more than just reading about them. stats was way less scary that i’d anticipated??!?!🥹🥹🥹🥹
Gave an excellent intro and roadmap to advanced concepts. I found the material mostly easy to understand and exercises were appropriately challenging- I wound up with an A in my class and only used this book/cengage to study.
All jokes aside this was one of the better textbooks I’ve read. It presented the information clearly and concisely, with helpful examples and analogies.
well I didn't really read the chapter in this book, it was a textbook required for my psych stats class, I read a little bit of the chapters when I needed to clear up stuff, but the thing that helped the most were all the tables. I did have the online version, but as a textbook, from what I did read, it explained things really well and gave through examples for topics that made sense. but I think the thing that helped me the most were the aplia assignments that go along with it. I feel like I learned the most from those than anything else. the lectures in class helped too, but overall the aplia assignments made the contact sink in and stick into my long term memory