What do you think?
Rate this book


227 pages, Hardcover
Published October 9, 2017
I picked up this book at the behest of my mentor, a historian. He recommended the text knowing my love of all things Southern Gothic. I perused the teaser and was immediately hooked. As a former student of history, I know how devastatingly dry historical texts can be. Slogging through pages of primary and secondary sources is grueling. However, I did not find myself plodding through Karen L. Cox’s book. In fact, I was engaged the whole time I read it. I find this to be true because this is not a standard nor typical history book. ,Goat Castle is history sensationalized. The book is daring and captivating where often secondary sources fail to achieve that feat. There is also a glaring problem with Cox’s choice to present her research this way.
The author makes clear from the starting point of her book that intrigue and shock are the main themes. Sure, there are subthemes such as race, class divide, and the gothic; but her overarching message is reminiscent of penny dreadful headlines. Cox liberally inserts assumptive language for the cast of historical figures. For example, as Octavia, Pink, Sister, and Dick are carrying out their sordid plan (really, the plan being Octavia’s), Cox asserts that, “They wanted the old biddy’s money” (Cox 63). This language smacks of zhuzhing up a historical recount to grasp the reader’s attention. I certainly do not blame Cox for taking these liberties. Interesting and exciting verbiage sells. But I question the validity of her research when she does this. That is a glaring complaint I have with Goat Castle. The facts are interesting enough presented as they are. There is no need to glamourize. As well, Cox loves the word “voyeur” and all its iterations. No seriously. She uses that word every chance she gets.
I also have a problem with the way she presented Emily Burns as the “strong black woman” trope narrative. She creates a trope out of Burns’ unfair persecution resulting in a two-dimensional presentation of the woman. Obviously, Burns’ endured more than any of us could imagine. She was wrongfully convicted and imprisoned losing eight years and some change of her life. But Burns’ was more than her conviction and response to it. She was a human with a range of emotions and thoughts beyond the confused and enduring that Cox insists upon painting her as. We received a multifaceted presentation of the white “characters” while not being given the same treatment for the black ones. I recognize there could be a lack of sources that caused this phenomenon, but Cox takes liberties with her research every chance she gets so there’s little excuse. I think that overall, Cox should have focused more on the race aspects of her book than she did. She has race as a main theme in her title but doesn’t prove successful in her analysis of this theme.
The book is fine. It is not necessarily the best historical work that I have ever read nor is it the worst. There was serious repetition in information given making me think there was a lack of overall source material for a full book. This happens sometimes in historical studies. I commend her for taking on this topic. My wish is that she would have pursued a different angle. 3.5 stars is what I give the work.