So I'm about 60 percent in, and it's not terrible, not entirely original with the whole new girl at a high school meets telepath boy thing, cough *Twiglite* cough, though thankfully the story does transition out of that routine into guardian training at a motel.. It's not entirely unimaginative either with it's take on angels, and there's quite a bit of chemistry and interesting story with the two main characters...
But damn, it could really use an editor.
Instead of just a stray comma or two, there's some missing words and continuity errors, like WHO THE FRAK IS SHIRLEY? - I swear to god she was never mentioned before until Sylva thinks about her family about nearly halfway through. "Mom, Dad, Jeffrey and Shirley's faces circled in my head" -LIKE IDK WHO THAT IS. And even if she was previously mentioned? It was a poor enough job done to have NFI who she was talking about. Maybe the cat? But I remember the cat's name was Mottles, Mots for short. It couldn't have been the cat. Her extra sibling? IDEK, because I swear she only had Jeffrey. Well, I'm not reading back again, but there are enough of other errors that I can only assume she did not exist. Lmao.
Frakking Shirley, man.
ETA: You know,... There really are a lot of Twilight 'things' in this book, like Abelin is basically CarsonCarlisleWhateverEddard'sDadWas ... you know the good doctor as head of the 'family' and HIS wife might as well be Esme. There's also.. remember the treetop thing that Ed and Belle had? Yeah, Attic and Sylva have a "treehouse" that's really high up. IDEK what's going on here, but there's definitely TOO MUCH overlap for it to be simply a coincidence. They'll prolly be playing a round of baseball before long now. lol.
ETA2: I like that Attic is a portal, that IS something for the plus mark with this book. But then I think about his full name, and that gets minus points. "Atticus Plot." - I won't fault for the Atticus Finch reference, even if I do find it obnoxious in a 'here quickly let me reference a good book to give my own book relevancy even though it doesn't have too much to do with the current story at all' type of way. But "Plot" for a last name? Hmmm... IS ABOUT ALL THE PLOT THIS BOOK HAS. Yeah.
ETA3: Now more than halfway in and the laughable continuity errors continue. -Attic is first described as having a ~silver~ earring in the beginning, an I'm pretty sure it was described as such because I was like "dude the only way that could be worse was if it were gold." AND THEN when Attic is telling Sylva about the sentimentality of the inscription of the earring later on IT IS GOLD. LOLLLLLLL.
Also... I swear that Attic's room number was 17 and somehow they give it to Jason? Like... IDK, that's strange? Am I mistaken? Again, not worth double backing to go check. And maybe that was supposed to be the sitch BUT IT IS NEVER COMMENTED ON. I don't geddit.
ETA4: THIS BOOK. I CAN'T. So,... Attic is entrusted with this pendent necklace that is 1/3 of a key to the gates of Hell. (Mucho mucho important object, right??).. SURE ENOUGH Attic takes it off simply. because. it. bothers. Sylva. AND THEN IT GETS STOLEN. Naturally. LOLLLLLLLLLLLLL.
ETA5: This a complaint for the entire book though in this later half it is entirely more relevant: they won't shut up about having sex and just how special it should be. Just stop talking, don't or don't do it, it's just sex. Please please PLEASE shut up. -And I think authors who use this sentiment should be prevented from writing again. The mystification of virginity needs to end in fiction. Seriously obnoxious. Just stop it.
ETA6: Oh no! The Volutri are coming to put Attic on trial! LMAO.
ETA7: Done. Finally I can rinse my brain from this tepid mess of a story with a large heaping of dumb on top.
Overall it was definitely entertaining for the wrong reasons, and 2 stars is prolly being kind. Ultimately, despite the errors and groan worthy developments, this story suffers from YAUN: the YA universal narrator, you've seen her before and you will see her again.
Blah.