What do you think?
Rate this book


First, while later historians have brought fresh perspectives to the Roman Empire’s collapse, Gibbon’s book remains profoundly truthful in the events it recounts, bringing what Professor Damrosch calls a “unifying, insight-inspiring perspective to the past.”
Second, a great work of history is just as much about storytelling as it is about events. Gibbon is a masterful storyteller, and his Decline and Fall still has the ability to hook modern-day readers with its style and manner—just like a great novel.
And third, Gibbon was (and remains) a landmark historian who revolutionized the way writers think about and interpret the past. Despite being a product of his time in certain views, his techniques and insights would lay the foundation for generations of future historians.
Audible Audio
Published March 3, 2017
• I was surprised how "un-barbaric" the barbarians were. When the city of Rome was sacked in 410 A.D. for the first time in almost eight hundred years by the Visigoths led by King Alaric, I found it interesting to note that the invaders considered themselves to be Christians (i.e. Arian Christians).The following is a listing of the lecture titles and a short description of their contents. The descriptions are copied from the The Great Courses website.
• Theoretically there were subtile theological differences between Arian and Catholic, however what really mattered was that Arians had no allegiance to the Pope.
• The so-called "sack of Rome" did not result in significant damage to buildings and monuments. The "sackers" were interested in things they could carry off in their sacks (e.g. gold and silver).
• Most architectural damage was done by citizens of Rome who used the old Roman structures as a convenient quarry that was much more conveniently located than the more distant rock quarries.