Ever since 2016, my favorite method of hiding from reality has been to sink into music biographies, especially about rock & roll musicians whose work I know well. I tend to favor information-heavy, carefully researched examples over ghostwritten memoirs or tell-alls, which are much thicker on the ground. When Nick Tosches died in 2019, knowing little of his work I read several claims that his book about Jerry Lee Lewis, Hellfire, was the greatest rock bio of them all. I was quite surprised I had never run across it or been aware of it, as being a celebrated text about a legend of the first wave of rock & roll, it seemed right up my alley; not only that but Greil Marcus, who may be my favorite living writer and certainly the biggest all-pervading influence on how I think and write about popular culture, had actively promoted it in glowing terms and even wrote the foreword to the paperback edition, wherein he praised it as a great work of American history. Marcus wasn't alone; numerous critics are quoted in the frontispiece making similar claims.
Of course I knew the broad narrative of Jerry Lee Lewis' life: even more tortured than the likes of Al Green and Little Richard (and Kanye West) over the contradictions between his rattling, sinful rock & roll persona and his obsession with following the Bible and serving the Lord, he was a dangerous, unpredictable misogynist and hypocritical moralist -- which runs in the family: his cousin is none other than Jimmy Swaggart; both took their middle names from a local magnate and political influencer in their hometown of Ferriday, LA -- and his downfall was the stuff of legend. Whereas Chuck Berry's early 1960s prison term is as easily described as a symptom of the waning Jim Crow era as of his (not insignificant) personal transgressions, Lewis seems to have been a full-on monster who never did time. His career derailed after he married his thirteen year-old cousin (a bigamous union to boot), which even within the unenlightened mainstream press of the '50s was an outrageously cancel-worthy act. Stories of domestic violence and general nastiness followed him around for the rest of his life, mellowed it seems only by the inevitable dimming of age; today he is the last of the original, major, fire-breathing rock & rollers to survive unless you count Don Everly and Dion, both great but neither capable of "Great Balls of Fire," "High School Confidential" and "Whole Lotta Shakin' Goin' On," which -- it must be said -- are astonishing records and it's easy to feel as though they are sounds that couldn't be made by a man who was healthy or well-adjusted.
But Berry's verbose nerdiness and Richard's intoxicating sexuality could of course incite the same kind of riotous furor Lewis could -- for that matter, so could the rather more self-possessed Ray Charles circa "What'd I Say" -- but there was definitely a violence and extremity audible in Lewis that Sun Records' Sam Phillips knew enough not to dilute. Only Gene Vincent among the rockabillies approached his unpredictability, and only Howlin' Wolf among any performer of the era was capable of the same sort of guttural, sexual abandon on his records; when you hear something like Lewis' Live at the Star Club, recorded well past his commercial peak in 1963, you hear an artist of bracing, daunting confidence who will burn down his house and yours without a blink -- a performer with nothing to lose. The notion that it might take such an unhinged, unpleasant maniac to create this kind of din is the uncomfortable Faustian bargain the fan of raw, undiluted rock & roll must sit with; and it's also a fascinating subject to examine. There's little mystery to what attracted Tosches to the material.
In this field I think it's important to keep in mind the differences between history and criticism. A writer of formally ambitious essays like Marcus can take a germ of suggestion from a record and use it to talk about whatever he wants; an offhand phrase in a song can set him off on a poetic tangent about an unrelated hate crime in the South or a tenuous connection or tradition he finds between two disparate pieces of art. This is inspiring and, to my mind, encourages deeper engagement with our culture. But Marcus is not a biographer; and if he chose to write a biography of, say, Van Morrison, I think it would be disappointing to the person seeking information about Morrison's triumphs and contradictions to find any facts therein buried under self-conscious prose and musing, more about the author's thought process than about the book's ostensible subject. Unfortunately this is what Tosches has crafted in Hellfire. The words might often be lyrical, though I think they are less so than they quite nakedly promote themselves as being, but they reveal nothing that the aforementioned "broad narrative" of Lewis' career doesn't already indicate, and I'm left longing for a book with different ambitions. Tosches is superficially a more colorful writer than Peter Guralnick, Mark Lewisohn or Susan VanHecke -- authors of extensive biographies of Elvis Presley, the Beatles, and Gene Vincent respectively that range from fascinating to outright brilliant -- but that does not mean that those writers lacked passion or a broader perspective in their work. Their commitment to facts, and to the citation of hard sources (Tosches' book has neither sources listed nor a simple, perfunctory bibliography), does not preclude the injection of humanity and critique into their work. Tosches' book, on the other hand, comes off as a skimming of the basic surface facts of Jerry Lee Lewis' life, rendered in prose as flowery as possible: a Wikipedia entry as composed by Rudyard Kipling.
Marcus's foreword cites a few specific examples of what he claims are exquisitely rendered paragraphs that mark this book as a future acknowledged literary masterpiece. Here is one of them:
The booze and the pills stirred the hell within him and made him to utter hideous peals. At times he withdrew into his own shadow, brooding upon all manner of things -- abominable, unutterable, and worse. At times he stalked and ranted in foul omnipotence, commanding those about him as Belial his minions. He was the Killer and he was immortal -- damned to be, for as long as there were good and evil to be torn between in agony. He would sit backstage in a thousand dank nightclubs, and he would know this, and he would swallow more pills and wash them down with three fingers more of whiskey, and he would know it even more. He would walk like a man to the stage, with his Churchill in one hand and his water glass of whiskey in the other, and he would pound the piano and sing his sinful songs, and he would beckon those before him, mortals, made not as he to destruction from the womb; he would beckon them to come, to stand with him awhile at the brink of hell. Then he would be gone into the ancient night, to more pills and more whiskey, to where the black dogs never ceased barking and dawn never broke; he would go there.
This is all good and well for a fiction written in third-person omniscient, but it's less similar to Guralnick's two-volume biography of Elvis or single volume on Sam Cooke, for instance, than it is to Richard Garvin and Edmond Addeoj's novel The Midnight Special, which is essentially two white men's salacious fan fiction about the great blues singer Huddie Ledbetter (Leadbelly), as legendarily troubled and violent as Lewis but on a much grander scale and with much less of a privileged starting position, not to say Lewis didn't have his dirt poor years. And as someone who tends myself toward wordiness and labored prose, I would like to know what information or enlightenment this paragraph honestly intends to deliver, especially in its second half, beyond a yearning by Tosches for his romantic conception of Lewis' self-hatred and self-destruction to be delivered in full bloom to the reader. This omniscience -- this claiming to depict accurately what Lewis was thinking at all times, a curious strand of thought for a book that's promoted as nonfiction -- manifests in its most ugly form in paragraphs like this one, which seems all too clearly to integrate Lewis' sinister attitudes toward women in almost empathetic terms:
Myra, who knew little of the world, simply believed that all marriages were like her own, and she bent her knee in diffident fealty. Still, he smelled a sinfulness in her. Women had thrown themselves on him for five years. Wherever he went, it seemed, cheap-perfumed tights parted, lithe and yielding as the windblown reeds of Turtle Lake -- had parted first to receive whatever scrap of garish, stinking fame and glory they might, then later to receive the grotesque wrath of that fame and that glory. Every time he disgorged himself in the mouth of whoredom, he cursed all women for what they had to him shown themselves to be. He turned on his wife, unable to believe or to see that she could be any different from the rest. He accused her of adultery, and he beat her. Perhaps his mother, who often stayed with the couple in Memphis, encouraged her dear son's accusations; for she, in motherhood, trusted none of Jerry Lee's wives, believing that they lusted only for his gold, and she spent time seeking to discover Myra Gale in an act of moist indiscretion.
That begs another question. I see no contradiction is saying that Lewis is, or was, one of the most consistently brilliant if fractious performers of recorded music in the 20th century, and also an inexcusably vile excuse for a human being-- moreover, it's not a matter of "separating art from artist," which I'd tend to regard as a pointless and self-defeating exercise, but of hearing and acknowledging that ugliness within the work, as something that colors and defines it, as an inseparable part of its cultural legacy and of one's personal response to it. When I hear Lewis' early Sun records or that magnificent live album, I know I'm hearing the work of a man I would never want to be in a room with. I don't even like looking at his face and I never have. I think Tosches does capture this rather well -- and the book even has the nerve to have been published before one of Lewis' wives died under the usual "mysterious circumstances," and moreover before Swaggart's own glorious public downfall, which somewhat violates the book's structure of contrasting them as good and evil sides of the same coin -- because he is as intrigued as most of us naturally are by the fuckups that ensue in all humanity, spotlight or not, but I think the way that he approaches Lewis as a kind of rugged anti-hero is troubling, especially when you counteract it with the portrayal by other authors of cultural biographies of their own subjects', for lack of a better term, personal failings.
By that I mean that generating a version of the Lewis story as a grand American tragedy, as Tosches implicitly and Marcus explicitly argue it is, insults the true idea of tragedy. Buddy Holly, Kirsty MacColl, Otis Redding, Jackie Wilson, Jam Master Jay and Patsy Cline were tragedies. Elvis Presley, in the end, was a tragedy. Even in the confines of Tosches' mythologized version of events, Jerry Lee brought his downfall upon himself, and the natural course of that downfall never rendered anything like clarity or wisdom. It's somewhat alarming to me that this most celebrated of rock & roll biographies attempts in expressionistic fashion to place the reader inside the head of a person whose cruelty and abuses are taken as a kind of funhouse mirror of classic Americana. I can't escape the feeling that Tosches attempts to do all this, and attempts to wean a kind of grandiose sorrow out of the process, because it is a book about a white man; because as in Ken Kesey's One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, the rage and bellowing of unchecked masculinity are looked upon as having some sort of sacred, universally primal utility.
I started to become deeply immersed in, and evangelical about, '50s and early '60s rock & roll, R&B and pop when I was in my early twenties, having had some familiarity with it in my childhood. As I've recounted many times, a chance encounter with a minor Everly Brothers hit from their Warner Bros. period ("Walk Right Back") set me on the path of discovering the infinite emotional possibility, the thrilling musical spareness and -- at times -- the tempestuous hunger and noise that exists in this music and no other. I became infatuated not only with the first wave of rock & roll but with girl groups, Brill Building pop and Motown around this time. Going deeper and deeper I found affinities and treasures that won't ever have books like this written about them. One artist who's always disproportionately fascinated me is Little Eva, born Eva Boyd, who hailed from the Outer Banks and was "discovered" while babysitting for Gerry Goffin and Carole King, two of the titans of the Brill Building. Boyd was tapped to perform the international #1 hit "The Loco-Motion" after Dee Dee Sharp turned it down, and inspired the legendarily controversial Goffin-King composition "He Hit Me (It Felt Like a Kiss)" -- recorded not by Eva but by the Crystals under producer Phil Spector, who played up its sadomasochistic, melodramatic aspects more than its composers may have intended -- after a conversation with the couple in which she defended her boyfriend's regular habit of beating her. They tried to generate further hits for Little Eva, including terrific songs like "Keep Your Hands Off My Baby" (covered beautifully by John Lennon on a Beatles BBC gig) and "What I Gotta Do (To Make You Jealous)" plus splendidly dumb dance-craze attempts "Let's Turkey Trot" and "Let's Start the Party Again," but nothing approached the success of "The Loco-Motion" and in an era of heady, insurmountable pop competition, each successive single did less business than its predecessor.
Like so many Black women who were distinctive performers of great pop music, Eva gleaned few long-term rewards for her brief chart success and ended up back in North Carolina by the early '70s, forgotten completely by the recording industry. Various resurgences of "The Loco-Motion" by Grand Funk and Kylie Minogue did nothing to lift her descent into poverty because she had no claims on the material; her former behind-the-scenes cohort Carole King became a pop star in her own right -- the one person in the business Lennon is said to have been nervous about meeting -- while Eva raised her kids on her own and toiled in food services. But Eva's oddball dancing and exuberant vocals had been as responsible as anything for determining King's longevity. When tracked down by interviewers and historians interested in the surviving performers on the oldies circuit -- to which she did return for a time, touring briefly in the late 1980s -- Eva was pricelessly thorny about her legacy and others' tendency toward capitalizing on it. She died at age 59 of cervical cancer, not far away from me geographically (in Kinston). Rock & roll, a ruthless business, is full of such stories -- the image-makers and the ubiquitous voices, whatever the scale of their popularity or obscurity, live eternal lives after their moments are permanently laid down, but there are still children to feed and clocks to punch, the usual rough-and-tumble existence of constant hustling and keeping one's head barely above water for all but a select few Lennons and Kings; and as we know, even they can't always avoid doom in some form.
I was DJing in downtown Wilmington once and played the Goffin cowrite "The Trouble with Boys," a late '63 b-side of Little Eva's I always loved that failed to chart but was miraculously clocked by a random well-dressed Boomer in the room, who approached me to comment that he had been the station manager for Wilmington's oldies station (WKOO, 98.7, still active until around 2004) in the early '90s when he ran across Little Eva, working as a waitress at a convention center for some radio industry event he attended for work. He had indicated to her that he recognized her and also made noises about who he was and how important he was, which available evidence indicates he was quite fond of doing; maybe she'd like to record some idents (probably for a pittance) or something? And in his telling she rolled her eyes and told him to get lost until he was ready for his check. He told me this story, carping about her "attitude," as though I was naturally going to side with him -- all these roving singers now forced to be waitstaff for assholes, god only knows why they would have an "attitude problem"! -- when instead I was just vicariously thrilled at her managing to get under this windbag's skin (like a real-life version of Bo Diddley's apocryphal slagging off of Eric Burdon in the latter's earshot) to such an extent that he still remembered it 15+ years later, five or six years after Eva Boyd died and was buried in an unmarked grave in Belhaven. (A tombstone has since been erected after town council was made aware of her cultural significance.)
To my mind, that's a very interesting life story -- a tragic one too -- and just from what little information I have of it, it feels like it could make a hell of a book. Maybe there's research to be excavated. Maybe not, though; maybe it even could be an expressionistic, "creative nonfiction" book like Tosches', one that just grabs at what little we have and extrapolates from it. Even that would tell us something we don't already know. We already know what it is like to be a white man who plays rock & roll, is a total creep and ruins everything he touches, because we have a great number of books about that. I'd like to read what it's like, what it's really like, to be someone who isn't white, who isn't a man, and who gets completely forgotten by the machine that cruelly gave them a taste of fortune and immortality. Lewis hardly needed help with the latter. He still walks among us, the only one of the Million Dollar Quartet who ever had to don a mask for COVID-19 (assuming he was compliant enough to do so), while Eva Boyd who sang "The Loco-Motion" and now, per her tombstone, "sings with the angels" is gone and so is Nick Tosches, who wrote so convincingly and glowingly of Lewis's inevitable slide toward doom and terror almost forty years ago. If any of these people really did make some sort of a deal with the devil, only one seems to have reaped the benefits.