Margarete Bö Tagebuch einer Verlorenen Berlin, F. Fontane, 1905 Neuausgabe. Herausgegeben von Karl-Maria Guth. Berlin 2017. Umschlaggestaltung von Thomas Schultz-Overhage unter Verwendung des Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, Halbakt mit Hut, 1911. Gesetzt aus der Minion Pro, 11 pt.
One of my favorite silent films is 1929's DIARY OF A LOST GIRL starring Louise Brooks. It is the story of a young woman who is abandoned by her family when she becomes pregnant out of wedlock. The movie follows her brutal fall and redemptive triumph.
I could see in the film's credits that it was based on a book, THE DIARY OF A LOST GIRL, written by Margarete Bohme in 1905 and then had fallen out of print. Although very curious about it, I didn't want to pay the "rare book" price and consequently forgot about it until my next viewing of the movie.
Recently, I discovered that a paperback edition has been made available by The Louise Brooks Society. It not only has the complete text, but it also features photographs from the film. Sold.
Not surprisingly from the title, the book is written in a diary format. It was interesting to learn that it was a highly controversial publication at the time and that it became an international best-seller. Readers were not only shocked by the content of a young woman forced into a life of prostitution ... but, it was also purported to come from an actual diary. In other words, this was presented as non-fiction.
To my knowledge, the writer never tried to dispel that rumor. However, the writing style is much too mature for the "lost girl" in question, often adding literary comments and sweeping poetical observations that we would be unlikely to find in the writings of a troubled teen at the turn of the century. Also, there are some "soap opera" occurrences that conveniently heighten the dramatic impact.
Does that mean that it's not worth reading? Not at all. THE DIARY OF A LOST GIRL is a very involving book. What I found amazing was how far the movie veered away from the book's plot ... especially when PANDORA'S BOX by the same director and with the same star adhered closely to the play that was its source.
The book couldn't be considered salacious at all in today's reading environment. No graphic scenes of sexual depravity are depicted and the language is polite throughout. Prurient interest could only be stirred by visualizing the downfall and degradation of an innocent.
What was especially surprising was that the movie ended with the central character's redemption and triumph. Although the story is different, when that point is reached in this book, that is not nearly the end of the tale. Plenty more will happen.
Throughout the work is a sense of a world that will not forgive. Mention is made on multiple occasions of how the "lost" or "fallen" would do almost anything to find a way back to decency and self-respect. However, time and again, society will not allow it. Those who have sinned must be ostracized. Over and over again, the elite and proper people are the most uncharitable when it would be easy for them to help. Consequently, those who succeeded in climbing back from a low station have to be very, very careful that their past is not uncovered ... it would undo everything they've accomplished.
A critic by the name of Hall Caine said that the book was a "poignant story of a great-hearted girl who kept her soul alive amidst all the mire that surrounded her poor body." I certainly couldn't say it better. Highly recommended.
Sittenroman.... so nannte man das damals. Ein Mädchen wird sozusagen schon von zuhause aus auf den unsittlichen Weg gebracht, womit ihr der Weg in ein normales Leben versperrt wird. Die Geschichte ist in Tagebuchform, man hat den Eindruck, dass sie echt ist, und der Autorin lediglich übermittelt wurde. Die Autorin hat sich selbst in die Geschichte hineingedichtet. Die Authenzitität, die dadurch erwirkt wird, ist faszinierend. Ich habe auch versucht, den dazugehörigen Stummfilm auf Youtube anzuschauen, aber ist nicht mein Ding.
La primera mitad está bien, pero luego es aburrido porque ya no pasa nada más que su vida “protegida” por algún amante. Entiendo que fuera interesante en su época por tratar el tema de una “perdida”, pero no hay mucho más.
By today's standards, this book is by no means scandalous. But it's easily understandable why the book caused such an outrage when it was first published.