My priors
First book of the year. I am, as usual, reading four or five at the same time. One pet project I decided to start this year was to read one national history for each of the countries of Europe, with some leeway for small ones, perhaps a common volume for the Benelux. I have a very good overall picture of world and European history, but I think I can profit from getting down to the nitty-gritty details.
So I decided to start with Germany. What was I looking for:
Something not too long (roughly ≤ 500 pages)
Not too centered on prehistory. Ideally, it should start in Antiquity or the Middle Ages, that is, when the clearest seed of the nation-state has started to grow
Centered on the main narrative and big-picture events. No “let’s devote a chapter to the development of corn cultivation in the eighteenth century in the region of X.” Politics, society, and economics in broad strokes, and in that order of preference.
The book’s contents
Hagen Schulze’s Germany: A New History offers a concise, synthetic account of German history from Roman antiquity to reunification, structured into fourteen relatively short chapters that together trace the slow, uneven, and often contingent formation of Germany as a political and cultural entity. Rather than assuming a timeless German nation, the book begins with the Roman and medieval worlds, stressing that “German lands” long existed within larger imperial, dynastic, and confessional frameworks, above all the Holy Roman Empire, whose weakness and fragmentation shaped central Europe for centuries. Schulze then follows the transition to modernity through the Reformation, the Thirty Years’ War, and the empire’s dissolution, before turning to the nineteenth century’s belated nation-building, unification under Prussian leadership, and the tensions embedded in the new Reich. The narrative continues through Germany’s bid for world power, the catastrophe of the First World War, the chaos and general fragility of the Weimar Republic, the radical rupture of National Socialism, and the devastation and moral collapse of 1945. The final chapters treat division during the Cold War and reunification in 1990, returning in the epilogue to the unresolved question of what Germany is and can be. Throughout, Schulze distances himself from heroic or teleological national narratives, treating German history as a complex and often belated process in which imperial legacies, political fragmentation, and Germany’s central position in Europe mattered at least as much as ideas of national identity.
My posteriors
Hagen Schulze’s book ticked the three boxes I included in my list of expectations. It is about three hundred and something pages long and starts in the Middle Ages, with a brief introduction on Hermann and the Roman-adjacent tribes. It also comes with lots of images that illustrate aspects of the main narrative.
I did not learn much in this book that I did not already know, although it did bring many semi-forgotten memories and ideas back to mind. If you do not know much about Germany’s history, it will be a decent introduction. In my case, I should probably have been looking for something longer and denser. Perhaps there is no good single-volume option for this in English.
There were, however, things that gave me food for thought. One is how the whole European post-Westphalian settlement was predicated on a weak and divided Germany, and on the great powers striving to make sure this remained the case, which feels quite unfair. Then again, once Germany did unify, we see what happened, twice. Another is how German nationhood remained both diffuse and strong. Implicitly, as a Spaniard, I tend to see Western history through a prism that works well only for a few states, namely the UK, France, and Spain itself: a strong medieval kingdom acting as the kernel for the future, a Renaissance that brings about a strengthening of royal power and a domestication of the nobility, and then nineteenth-century liberalism completing the construction of the nation-state. Germany overturns this model, as do Italy and probably most parts of Europe. My expectation tends to be that the kingdom creates the nation-state, given some base ethnic, religious, linguistic, and cultural homogeneity that it then uses its tools to reinforce and deepen. In Germany, instead, you get a very long, drawn-out process in which some sort of national consciousness develops and diffuses and is frequently at odds with existing state structures.
Another interesting aspect of the book is how it avoids falling into narratives of historical inevitability. Had they not been distracted by events and misfortune, the Hohenstaufens, or Emperor Maximilian, might have created a strong medieval kingdom of the western European type. If the Reformation had been avoided, or had been more successful, or if the Habsburgs had won the Thirty Years’ War, a strong Germany might also have come into being two centuries earlier. If the victorious Allies of the First World War had dealt more reasonably with Germany, the Weimar Republic might have survived and continued seamlessly into a modern, democratic, westernized country. Reunification itself was not a given. It required another opening in the window of historical contingency, brought about by the collapse of the Soviet empire and the economic and political disaster that “really existing socialism” had produced across eastern Europe in general and in the German Democratic Republic in particular. While there are large trends in history, there is also a great deal of contingency that we tend to brush under the table, since past events cannot be replayed and counterfactuals remain intellectual exercises.
All in all, this was an entertaining, light read. It was also published just after reunification. I wonder what the author’s assessment would be of the Berlin Republic, and whether he would remain optimistic about the current problems Germany and Europe are experiencing.