Saraswati: The goddess of vach, speech and knowledge. Ever wondered why the river was named so? Could it be that most ashramas were located on the bank of the river, most prominent sages also lived along the river which is attributed to the naming.. the trickles, ripples and bubbles of the flowing water somehow provided a suitable environment for thinking-learning process?
The author has compiled and cited works of Indologists along with references from Ramayana And Mahabharata to prove the existence of the now extinct Saraswati river along with many maps.
He gradually moves from establishing the existence through citation to changing course of the rivers in the region such as Yamuna, Satluj, Ghaggar, Chautang, Markanda et cetera citing references from Mahabharata, tectonic events and aerial photography. Also suggesting subterranean palaeochannels in ten districts of Rajasthan including Jaisalmer and Bikaner districts.
Part 2
In part two the author goes back to the INDUS VALLEY civilisation excavating the subsequent events beginning from Major F. Mackeson in 1849 to Cunningham in 1872 to John Marshall and companions in early 20th century. The findings equate the civilisation with earliest Elamite (Sumerians) and suggests to Regionalisation era (mid-4th millennium BCE) characterised by interactions between the contemporaries leading to agglomeration. French Archaeologist in 1960s have come across Mehrgarh (250ha) in Baluchistan dating back to 7000 BCE. Author notes that most of the sites were discovered post independence in the regions of Sind, Punjab and Baluchistan of Pakistan. Mohenjo daro as per Michael Jensen is considered to one of the largest urban settlements of the ancient integration era (ref. Jim Shaffer) with about 300 hectares of area. Also points out that the Bhirrana, Ganweriwala and Kalibangan regions on Hakra and plausible Saraswati river bed had considerable settlements while Bhirrana with 5th millennium radiocarbon dates refer to antecedents of Harappan culture.
REM Wheeler’s stratigraphic excavation of Mohenjo Daro and Harappa put a trademark on Indian archaeology. The Indus cities priortised citizen living standards which is evident in their meticulously planned drainage, garbage disposal system and ample availability of water along with standardised signs, weights, seals et cetera. The quality of bricks used and the foundation of walls supporting two upper storeys, manufacturing-metallurgical setups as well as internal and international trade with other Bronze age civilisations along Makran coast, Dilmun, Magan(Oman, Bahrain, Kuwait) Ur, Kish (Mesopotamia) to the west; Bacteria, Shortughai, Margiana (Turkmenistan) of Oxus civilisation to the north.
Due to lack of proper evidences, scholars such as Gregory Possehl, BB Lal, DK Chakrabarti believe in a structure of confederacy of regional powers sharing a common interests and culture than a centralised administrative unit. Another unique highlight of the civilisation is lack of evidences of military violence. But we can not put this into concrete as only 5-10% sites have been excavated till now. Author connects the Harappan sites with Saraswati with Kalibangan site which was discovered earlier in 1917 by Luigi Pio Tessitori.
Post Partition of India
Another important contribution was made by Sir Aurel Stein in the early 1940s which facilitated further studies after the partition when most sites went to Pakistan. Following Stein’s work ambitiously, director general of ASI -Amalanand Ghosh and team discovered around 100 more sites in 1950s of which 25 resembled to Harappa and 75 were of later cultures ie. Painted Grey Ware. He was the first one to identify the sites as Saraswati valley. Further Suraj Bhan in 1960, KN Dikshit in 1963, among others made further explorations in the region. Lothal was excavated by SR Rao in 1954. JP Joshi discovered Dholavira in 1966. Apart from 2378 sites in the region, 44 Harappan sites have been discovered in Ganga Yamuna doab marking Ganges as the eastern limit of the civilisation as Tapti the southern. Throughout the location and count of the sites the author dictates the Saraswati Valley or Indus-Saraswati civilisation as proposed by SP Gupta (1989), JM Kenoyer (1998), Jane McIntosh among others. Archaeology also suggests that in early phase Yamuna and Sutlej were also among Saraswati’s tributaries. While the reason for drying up of the Saraswati has been identified as tectonic shifts leading to change in course of major tributaries cutting off the water supply to Saraswati (Gregory Possehl, KS Valdiya, Wilhelmy, VN Mishra). Thus establishing the Ghaggar-Hakra basin as the RigVedic Saraswati.
About the COLLAPSE of the civilisation, there three prevalent school of thoughts being Aryan invasion, Political or economic turmoil and Natural disaster. Researches show that the region had moved from wet to arid due to cutoff of water in Hakra river by 3000BCE, while the intensity of south-west monsoon also started declining towards 2200 BCE. Along with the evidences of fossil remains of animals found at sites like Kalibangan suggest a humid climate in the region against the desert conditions at present.
The flooding and shifting of the Indus course is a prominent theory as well which was caused due to additional water from Beas and Sutlej away from Saraswati. Distribution of sites from Early to late phase suggests the above theories.
Part 3
In order to prove a coherence between the Indus-Saraswati civilisation and Ganges civilisation or vedic culture later, the author presents similarities in measurement, scale, weights, planning, architecture, signs, symbols, motifs, toys, games of the different cultures which are considered to be the earlier’s legacy. It is also suggested that the Indus symbols might have developed into Brahmi script towards the 1st millennium BCE. The author also dismisses the Aryan Invasion theory due to lack of physical evidence.
A crucial question arises if the Saraswati had dried up by Late harappan period ie. 1900BCE, and it has mentions in Rig Veda- the earliest veda, then isn’t it imperative that the Rig Veda and the Mahabharata must have occurred before the said period of composition (ref. Max Müller) and when the Saraswati was flowing full (not later than 3000 BCE)? The author addresses many such confusions and theories citing scholarly works.