Ah yes. The controversial I am Suicide volume. Honestly, I am a lot confused about this volume. I thought it was an improvement, in terms of execution, compared to the first volume of the series because objectively looking at it Tom King did a better job at presenting the story than he did in the previous volume. What I find problematic is what this volume is trying to say about the character of Batman. And yes, I realize that the problems I have are subjective, mainly because it all depends on how one views Batman as a character. I have never been a fan, or a believe, of the whole "the story of Batman has and always will be a tragedy" take on the character. We have many examples that it doesn't need to be so!
Halfway though the volume Batman narrates (what is admittedly a kinda good speech in terms of writing) about his parent's death, his childhood and the reason he became Batman. I don't want to spoil the controversial thing that Batman said that everyone was surprised with, but what we take away from the monologue is basically this: Bruce Wayne died the night his parents died, and Batman was born. That little boy chose to "die" so in turn Batman could live, so in turn he could save people. It makes it seem as if Batman is the true self, Bruce Wayne playboy persona is a mask, while the real Bruce Wayne died.
I don't agree with this because I think if you look at it this way, Batman and his motivations became almost problematic. If you separate Batman from Bruce Wayne, you are left questioning the sanity of the character. And sure, you can say that that sanity was always in question, but I think it would be less in question if Batman and Bruce Wayne are taken to be the same person, because then it would allow for a better grasp on the concept that Bruce Wayne was in control and that Batman truly is a persona he uses to help people and save the world. So yes, I tend to believe that Batman is a mask and that Bruce Wayne is still the real person. I don't think Bruce had to die in order for Batman to be born, and it kinda annoys me when writers take his character in this direction.
Catwoman was also an important character in this volume, and had I read this a couple of years ago I would have loved the story between her and Batman, as was presented here, so much! But lately my feelings toward Catwoman appear to have cooled. And again, objectively this was a good part of the story, but I still don't know if I agree with the message behind it. Actually, no, I don't agree. Long story short, the conclusion we end with is that Catwoman is the one who understand Batman the best, that the pain they both feel stops when they are together, and that she loves him and he loves her, and that maybe someday they can be together. I mean, this is not the case at all!
Catwoman is the one that understands him best? Really, the best? I mean I would have accepted one of the best, but the best? What about Alfred? What about Dick? Barbara, Damian, Jason, Tim? Batman has had so many complicated relationships in his life, so many important people around him, that I don't think it's fair to say this one person understands him the best. Or maybe I'm way too annoyed by this.
Anyway, I think that by the amount of stuff I wrote here, my confused relationship with this volume is visible. Or maybe I just want a couple of volumes where we get a slightly more happy Batman. Actually, I read in another review someone mentioning that Tom King wrote Batman in Grant Morrison style. And I was just like "Yes! I can see that!" Maybe that's what it is. Granted it's not as bad but yeah I can see the similarities in this volume. With the exception of like Super Sons, after reading this and Batgirl, can we please have back the New 52?
(Also, Batman did everything he did in this volume to get The Pirate from Bane in order to help heal Gotham Girl, but we never saw the resolution of that storyline. I hope we get to see it in the next issues because I actually don't mind Gotham Girl all that much.)