If you’re a dog owner wondering why balanced dog training gets a bad rap, this book serves as a pretty good explanation.
As a dog owner with one super sweet goofball dog and one super anxious challenging dog, I have spent a great deal of time learning about dogs. Aside from reading books, I’ve watched hours of webinars, attended a few seminars and online classes, and easily participated in over 100 hours of in-person dog training classes that don’t include the hours spent on structured pack walks with dog trainers.
I skew to the positive end of dog training, probably because I used to teach middle school students. There are many similarities between training your dog and teaching middle schoolers. Ideas like…
Reinforce the behaviors you want.
Build relationships to build trust.
Wait time is your friend.
Within the opening chapters of this book, the Monks define the three branches of dog training: the dominance-based trainers, the purely positive trainers, and the balanced trainers.
The Monks hold up balanced dog training as the happy medium between the two distinct ends of the spectrum. Sounds ideal, right?
When I started learning about dog training, I liked the idea of balanced training. (I still do, which is why I read this book hoping for a better take on balanced dog training).
I’m okay with telling my dogs “uh-ah” or "no". I’m fine with using proximity to steer my dogs. I used to use a squirt bottle to spray water on the paws of my demand barker.
These are all aversives, so within the world of purely positive, none of these techniques would be okay. But within balanced training, they’re fine.
The problem, though, is that there are balanced dog trainers, like the Monks of New Skete who seemingly ignore science.
The biggest myth the Monks push, and they push this one hard is that dogs are pack animals. Go Google that one. The whole alpha wolf idea came from an incredibly flawed study involving captive wolves. Other researchers have studied feral dogs living on the street. No packs there. But the Monks insist that your dog is a pack animal that requires you to be the pack leader.
Nope!
If you read carefully, you’ll see how the majority of their techniques are supported by “We believe” statements. Basically, anecdotal evidence. While anecdotal evidence contributes to a more entertaining book about dogs filled with carefully selected success stories, that’s not science.
Another big no go for me: repeated sexist stereotypes being pushed.
In at least two places, the Monks discuss anxiety. Both times they use female pronouns to describe either an anxious woman or an anxious female dog. They even included the word neurotic with female pronouns.
I listened to the audiobook, so tracking pronouns was a bit hard, but at some point I may read the physical book so I can highlight easier. If I do, I’ll be writing an even more in depth review on my blog, so I’ll drop a link here.
In a few places they also describe spoiled dogs. Examples include owners carrying a dog around in a purse, using baby talk, and infantilizing their dogs.
I’m sure these people exist, but the Monks make it sound like a plague. And again their language choices imply that female owners just don’t know what they’re doing.
Along the same questionable language choice lines, they pejoratively refer to positive reinforcement training as “treat training”.
First, this bugs me on a personal level because I don’t actually train with treats. I train with food. Not kibble. Actual yummy food that motivates my dogs. I measure how much food I use for training and I balance that with the food they receive at their meals.
The Monks tell you that they use treats too, but their way is better. They use many treats when they’re introducing a new concept to a dog and then taper off the use.
Duh!
That’s what positive reinforcement trainers do as well. Denise Fenzi actually has an entire book dedicated to teaching dog owners how to fade the cookie. She describes how she wants your dog to be an optimistic gambler.
The Monks have some limited advice that any dog owner could benefit from. Ideas like…
Make sure your dog has as consistent of a schedule as you can create and maintain.
Don’t force your dog into a crate. Instead make the crate a safe space for your dog.
Remember to have fun and play with your dog.
Finally, I was annoyed by how general this book was. It’s really more of an overview of their beliefs about dogs and philosophy of dog training.
I did find it funny that the Monks are highly critical of anyone who uses the internet to find answers to whatever problems they’re having with their dog. Then a few chapters later when they’re discussing food and nutrition, they advocate for doing some Internet research.
Yeah, okay🤦🏻♀️