Afro-Pessimism illuminates, with the intention to abolish, the omnipresence or anti-Black racism in modern society.
In the wake of uprisings and public outrage at the continual murder of Black people by the police, discourse is incrementally acknowledging racialized police violence and discrimination in all areas of society. Yet there is a fissure between the prescriptions offered to rectify these issues and the failure to bring that about. Afro-Pessimism offers an analytical lens to examine this gap and the ways in which society is structured through anti-Black racism. Afro-Pessimism: An Introduction is a collection of articles compiled for the purpose of offering an overview of this theory. The collected articles span three decades of thought and cover, in addition to police violence, topics ranging from the labor of Black women and the slave's transformation following the emancipation to the struggles of the Black Liberation Army and the elements of anti-Blackness in Indigenous struggles for sovereignty.
Frank B Wilderson III is an American writer, dramatist, filmmaker and critic. He is a full professor of drama and African American studies at the University of California, Irvine.
This book joins the populous set of "I am excited that something like this exists, and I want it to be a better version of itself." This is a project where someone(s) took texts out of academic journals and books and made them available for free and cheap, just because they wanted to share ideas they consider useful tools/weapons/etc. In many cases the original materials are either costly or behind those academia access walls. It's a kind of popularizing/radicalizing/pirating project, which I can really love. And I've been interested for a while (since reading a little interview Frank Wilderson did around the time of Ferguson) in getting more of an idea of Afro-Pessimist ideas, so when I found this in a local bookshop (for like $6 or so) I picked it right up.
There are a lot of good ideas in here, and also some pieces I couldn't get into. I wonder about the editor(s)' choices, for example "The Burdened Individuality of Freedom" (Saidiya Hartman) was a very frustrating read for me, like it was floating without its context; I wondered while reading if it was an excerpt and, yes, it turns out it's a chapter from Scenes of Subjection. Part of the idea is to get you to read more from each author you liked, but excerpting is tricky.
Also, a couple/few of these texts were heavily laden with jargon and tortured sentences. I can swallow a good bit of jargon, but at times while reading those texts I was not having it. Makes me wonder about form and content: is the writer using tortured prose to express ideas of suffering, born of suffering...? The jargon-heavy pieces were also the excerpted ones--Hartman and Spillers, if I remember right (it's been almost two weeks now). I just don't feel they work well for the purpose of introduction. Wilderson's and Sexton's pieces in here are much more intro material.
According to their blog, the publisher (Racked & Dispatched) is no longer shipping these out, but there are pdfs to download and print: https://rackedanddispatched.noblogs.org
i don’t really know how to give a star rating to a book like this. wilderson’s idea of afropessimism isn’t new to me but never doesn’t leave me a little shell shocked. it’s bleak, depressing, deserving of the ‘pessimism’ suffix but, above all it’s kind of depressingly true. the legacy of slavery is a universal constant in all discussions of the roles and experiences of black people within society (particularly in the US: i would love to see how afropessimism would work in dialogue with postcolonialism or diaspora studies) and wilderson, hartman and martinot & sexton’s exploration of the purpose of violence against black people was chilling in it’s reality. there are areas i struggled with: i refute wilderson’s idea that he is his wife’s slave — it feels like a moment where theory and reality disagree and his handling of it “it’s not my job to fix it” feels clunky and painfully 21st century (derogatory). it was sharpe that marked my first introduction to afropessimism but wilderson who is really cementing it. i’ll definitely read more.
I think this could be fruitful if used with the right intentions. There are aspects to this that I don’t agree with cause i think it’s divisive however there are understandings within that if applied correctly could foster clarity and unity. I have a love/hate relationship with this book, i like it because it makes me question but hate it for the same reason.
it’s so interesting that i finish this book the day after the election. reading this series of essays, i go “how can i not believe this? i experience it. i feel it”. great starter book