It does have some interesting insights in the first few chapters. The author, Gary Small, was clearly introduced to computers as an adult, and speaks about their usage with the accent of an immigrant to the digital world (to borrow one of his own descriptions). Often, his description of some aspect of online culture seems just a bit "off"--he's writing about something he's observed and studied, not something in which he's a full and comfortable participant. That occasional bit of jarring drawback doesn't keep him from sharing fascinating information about, for example, what areas of the brain are active when people perform various internet-based tasks while being monitored by fMRI, and I'm intrigued by the differences discovered in that kind of exploration.
I finished those first chapters still enjoying the book, by reminding myself to appreciate the author's experience and perspective without expecting him to write like Jean Twenge. (I read her Generation Me just before this, and she writes as a "Digital Native"--which probably emphasizes the difference between her perspective and Gary Small's.
Unfortunately, after the first few chapters, the book goes downhill quickly. While trying valiantly to offer a balanced perspective in which both beneficial and maladaptive changes are observed and noted, Small's lack of comfortable personal experience with the social web shows through strongly, and his conclusions are biased by his fears and his inability to recognize adaptive aspects of some (not all) of the traits he describs. After a few chapters of this, the downhill slide accelerates, as Small gets downright preachy. A lot of his advice is fairly common-knowledge stuff, much of which I've taught in life skills and related courses, but he offers it as if no one but he had ever thought of it before. Also, for these sections, there's almost no narrative, description, or new data--just preachy advice.
Also, I would have preferred Small include numbers linked to his endnotes. The endnotes exist, but I didn't read or evaluate them while reading the main text, because nothing in the text indicated when a given statement was noted. Sometimes the phrasing made it obvious, but other times it didn't, and I wasn't going to flip constantly to the back of the book after every sentence just to find out if there was a note associated with it. I like footnotes that elaborate on the text, and like being able to evaluate the reputations of cited sources by checking the endnotes, but the choice to omit any mention of the notes within the body of the text was just plain annoying.
One more major annoyance, which should probably have been mentioned right up front: Small constantly refers to the brain "evolving" right now, but most of the time he misuses the word. Sometimes he may intend to imply that because of dramatic changes in our environment, we're currently in one of the periods of rapid evolutionary change predicted by the punctuated equilibrium model ... but if so, he doesn't even begin to say so directly. Instead, he gives the casual reader the impression that "evolution" is something that happens within a single person's lifetime, within a single brain ... which it just isn't. "Adaptation" might have worked, but he didn't say "adaptation"--he repeatedly said "evolution," and I grew more and more irritated with that. There are enough people debating this particular concept based on out-of-date assertions and just plain bad information without muddying the waters further.
So, bottom line: two stars here, because I did like a little bit of the information near the beginning and decided not to slam the book completely. But, I'd have given it 1 and a half if that were an option, too.
MILL NON-FIC ADULT ST MAIN RM 612.8 SMA