Lawler presents a thorough investigation of Roanoke research up to 2018. He masterfully navigates the treacherous shoals of academics, half-crazed eccentrics, historical spies and villains, and a cast of supporting actors into a clearly-written and memorable memoir of his own descent into Roanoke Fever / hysteria. As Lawler succumbs to a desperate need to solve the mystery of the lost colony, he pulls himself up and offers a clear analysis of the circumstances. Readers may recall Horowitz's Confederates in the Attic. How Lawler maintains his sanity is a story unto itself.
History books pass over the "lost colony" of Roanoke. England sent settlers ca. 1586 and they disappeared by 1590. The only clue is a mysterious, even sinister carving, "Croatoan." That carving, Lawler relates has often been used as a muse for the supernatural, the exotic, and the macabre. In fact, it simply refers to a neighboring island with an English-friendly Indian tribe. The odd Governor of the colony, John White, who left his daughter and grand-daughter in 1587 to petition support from the English court, returned to the island in 1590. His behavior on the return voyage is bizarre; but in his written report, he says that there was a secret token to indicate why the settlers left. There was no secret token, so everything was fine, and he returned quietly to England and obscurity. If anything, it seems like his report is the secret token or coded message, rather than one he outlines and Lawler emphasizes.
In fact, the "lost colony" was the second colony, possibly the third. Sound confusing? It is because our history books gloss over the history of the failed colony. The first colony was barely surviving when Francis Drake, the pirate and hero to a nation, pulled into port and rescued the survivors. The possible second colony comes from the mysterious 200+ slaves Drake liberated from the Spanish Caribbean. He took them to Roanoke; but when he arrived in England, they were gone. There is no mention of liberated Indians and Africans leaving his ships. Some historians, including Lawler believe that Drake abandoned the former slaves in the same vicinity as Roanoke.
Lawler provides much better commentary on the strange happenings at the colony sites and the colonists themselves. Suffice to say Governor White appears to be more distraught over the loss of his material possessions than the absence of his daughter and grand-daughter. Lawler discusses various theories, problems, and probabilities before he begins his own quest.
The middle part of the book is more about Lawler traveling around Pimlico and Albermarle Sounds visiting various parks, archeological sites, and pursuing local folklore. His journey to the brink of madness shows how other researchers crossed the boundary of sanity and suffered the consequences. Lawler has an obvious gift for engaging people and wrangling details from them. He also has deep pockets. One thing that bothered me through the middle chapters was his cavalier attitude to travel. As he carefully pursues each lead, he follows through with random (possibly repeated) trips to the United Kingdom, Spain, and Portugal. For example, he is curious about a ring with a lion that could be a coat of arms - so a trip to the UK and the College of Arms. No definite results, a little more speculation; but entertaining and thorough. He has an amazing talent of bringing researchers together and have them argue out their theories - principally for his (and the reader's) benefit. All of this could only be done with some sort of carrot - probably money.
The result of the various pursuits remains inconclusive. One archeologist discovered a smithing forge on Roanoke. That is the only definite proof of settlement. Other archeologists found European goods in various places; but nothing definitive. There are no massive trash pits or foundation ruins. There are some curious discoveries such as Governor White covering a fort on his map and then re-drawing that fort with invisible ink. But the fort remains undiscovered. Lawler ultimately slashes through the academics with Ockham's Razor to say the most likely end of the colony was native assimilation - not necessarily Croatoan. Returning to the odd mystery of the ex-slaves, Lawler offers readers a theory that this lost colony was assimilated and formed a specific tribe that tried o keep itself hidden and separate from everyone else. It is a strange possibility, albeit interesting. Oh how I wish I could find someone to discuss it!
The last part of the book is a collection of chapters discussing Roanoke in the Humanities. Poor Virginia Dare is depicted as a blond-haired, blue-eyed girl surrounded by savages - the rallying cry of white supremacists. It took a long time to make a softer image of the Natives and Lawler shows how this transformation occurred. It is not accepted by the locals who formed their own beliefs and superstitions; but it is interesting. It is also long. I breezed through most of the book; but the last chapters were something of a slog.
Overall, Lawler is a brilliant storyteller. I enjoyed reading this book. This is rare instance where I feel my review does a disservice in discussing the book. There is more to the story than 100+ missing colonists. There is more to it than the thought of savages destroying civilization. There is a secret token. Lawler indicates that Governor White's report makes him appear very odd with warped priorities and weak leadership. Lawler does venture further to indicate that White was probably versed in the espionage techniques of his day, so his biased and unconvincing report is likely incomplete. But that is a matter for other researchers and writers suffering from Roanoke Fever. Along the way Lawler met many people - stuffy academics, crazed amateur historians, and every-day people. Most of whom deserve mention in the book offering their own thoughts and traditions. A few who rubbed Lawler the wrong way are skewered with particular style. The amateur archeologist who threatened Lawler is presented as being crazier than a half-starved colonist gone native. An "Oxford don" is presented as the paradigm of academic hubris. All in all, enlightening and entertaining.