I pulled this off my TBR because I've been watching too much OFMD and I wanted 18th century gay pirates in book form. And I fully admit that that's my bad, because we're talking basic failure of due diligence. 18th century, check; gay, check; pirates, nope. Or at least not the good kind. Definitely, definitely not the good kind. And tonally, this book is about as far from the generous, joyous, funny, empathetic OFMD as it is possible to get: it goes hard for the pining, but in an angst-ridden way. Nothing wrong with that, and probably the vibe I should have expected, but not what I was going for.
Inability to read the blurb aside, though, I really wanted to like this. It was clear pretty early that my expectations and the actual book were in misalignment, but I think I managed to course-correct and take the book as-is rather than as-I-wanted. Unfortunately, it just did not work for me in some pretty fundamental ways:
1) Racist and homophobic language. This book was published in 2009, and I suspect/ hope things have changed since then in terms of how authors of historicals deal with offensive language. Because I feel like nowadays when characters are using racist, homophobic, misogynist, etc language in dialogue, this is less the author saying "look at me being historically accurate with my characters' offensive terminology" and more "this character is an asshole and that's why I'm putting this filth in their mouth." In other words, writing offensive language into a text is (again, I hope) less about some idea of verisimilitude and more about signalling something about a character (either to set up a redemption journey or to demonstrate their irredeemability). That is not the case here. There is really offensive language use throughout, and not even or only in dialogue -- it's also just used descriptively in the narration. And call me a snowflake, whatever (I'm special, cold, and fluttery! None of these things bother me!), but I just get kind of taken aback when unnamed characters are just casually described using really racist (or sexist or homophobic) terms, for no apparent reason other than to give us that authentic feeling of historical racism/sexism/homophobia. This is a YMMV thing, obviously, but I think as a reader I'm just over the whole "historical authenticity = making people the absolute WORST" equation. Thanks, but no thanks.
2) Really very graphic descriptions of torture, like, my god. Here I am being all special, cold, and fluttery again, but page after page of extremely graphic on-page torture is . . . yeah, no. Again, YMMV. It's not like the torture was being done for shits and giggles; there was lasting trauma in both MCs owing to the torture they (separately) endured. But this was just way too torture-tastic for sensitive little me.
3) The miscommunication trope. Also known as my least favorite of all the tropes, except possibly "incredibly annoying family that we're supposed think is adorable and not borderline emotionally abusive" and, of course, fake pregnancy/miracle baby. (Yeah, this review is one big tangent. Sorry.) Anyway. Miscommunication. Look, miscommunication happens! Done well, it can be really effective. But I hate, HATE the whole miscommunication-based-on-one-character-actively-not-correcting-the-mistake-because-REASONS thing. Which is the case here. The one MC pulls strings at great cost to himself to literally save the life of the other; the one whose life is saved, not aware of the string-pulling or costs, blames the other MC for abandoning him in his time of need; the string-puller, instead of being like, "hey, I actually saved your ass, you're welcome" instead decides he must not say anything because (honor? doesn't want the other dude to feel obligated? he just likes to suffer?) -- and this goes on for chapter after chapter, where they're both miserable and being horrible to each other and suffering for ABSOLUTELY NO REASON. I admit that I ended up just skimming to the end because I couldn't take it anymore. And then when the one MC finally finds out what the other did for him, he . . . shows up dead drunk at the dude's house, and then they shag, and then all's well. That was literally it! There was no conversation or acknowledgment of the stupid dumb miscommunication that the last 20 percent of the book was devoted to! This does not inspire me as to their HEA!
Tl; dr: this is actually a really well-written (uh, offensive language aside) book that would probably have worked great for me if I was a fundamentally different person. Ho hum.