Loren D. Estleman has written some 30 books in his Amos Walker detective series. This is the first, published in 1980. It's the first I've read, and I've learned a valuable lesson: don't begin a new mystery series by reading the first novel. I'll admit that I started here with the idea that I'd read them in order. I've started that way with numerous other series. It finally dawned on me this time that I've never read the complete series of anything. There are too many other interesting things to read, so why devote the time for 30 novels to only one character or author? I'll probably read another Amos Walker mystery, but I'll jump ahead to number 20 or so.
The series appealed to me because of its Detroit setting. When the text mentions specific locations, I can look at Google maps and think, "I know where that is." It gives me more hooks on which to hang the narrative. It also reminds me, sadly, that Detroit in 1980 was a very different city from the trendy, up-and-coming city it is today. Amos Walker's Detroit is gritty, decaying and dangerous. This novel is set in winter, an appropriate choice for enhancing the atmospherics: dirty snow, bleak derelict houses, early darkness. Estleman clearly set out to write a hard-boiled detective story in the manner of Raymond Chandler. He succeeded - kind of. The book contains the requisite house of prostitution, complete with an essentially decent hooker who helps Private Eye Walker solve the mystery he's been hired to solve. Fittingly, Walker gets beat up, shot, and otherwise assaulted, but good triumphs over evil in the end (does that merit a spoiler warning?). Appropriately for the genre, some of the supposedly good guys turn out to be bad guys and the innocent runaway teen that Walker is tasked with finding turns out to be not so innocent after all. True to genre, Walker makes use of police-department contacts and trades assistance with them, but demonstrates in the end that the lone, independent Private Eye is more free to solve the crime than the bureaucracy-indentured cops. This is all rendered in classic noir style where the outlandish and sometimes gauche metaphors and similes lay atop the torpid peanut butter toast of the narrative like a thick, undulating layer of orange marmalade (they're not that bad, but you get the idea). Walker even wears a fedora, the brim at an angle.
One reality that's a bit jarring is no fault of the author. Having been written in 1980, the book describes a world very different from today. I remember that world but find it tedious sometimes to wait for Amos Walker while he wastes precious time looking for a public phone that works. More significantly, I'm saddened to be reminded of what Detroit was in 1980 - a hollowed out husk of a city that suffered the trauma of a fiery, destructive race riot in 1967. In its wake, thousands of Detroiters abandoned the city and its housing stock for the perceived safety of the suburbs, leaving entire blocks of unoccupied houses to squatters or arsonists. Today, thousands of those dilapidated or destroyed homes have been razed and some of the lots are actually being farmed. Remaining houses are being renovated and gentrified, with the process chronicled on HGTV. There's no way Estleman/Amos Walker could have anticipated these changes, so the book instead depicts a crumbling, dystopian city, the perfect backdrop for the moral rot lying at the heart of noir fiction.
Estleman is culpable for another reality, though. Walker's racist comments and language belie an inherent bias toward Blacks. The behavior is for the most part not glaring, but reading with 21st Century sensibilities, I find it pervasive. These are words that Estleman put in his character's mouth and behaviors that Walker shows no awareness about. I hope that both Estleman and Walker discovered or were made aware of their biases and changed their attitudes in subsequent novels.
All of the novel's inherent shortcomings are forgivable sins, however, especially for a first effort. Why read a Private Eye story if you bridle at narrative formula? The test of the best detective stories, though, is that they employ the formula with such subtlety and nuance that you don't notice it's there. Complexities, not only of plot but of character and theme, along with stylistic elegance, cause the good ones to rise above formula while riffing on it. Amos Walker is interesting enough, and Detroit is interesting enough, to make me want to read another Estleman chronicle of Amos Walker's exploits - one set about 20 years later, and occurring about 20 novels into the series.