*ROSS ULBRICHT IS NOW A FREE MAN*
I was simply looking for the exact dates The Silk Road operated (beyond just 2011-2013) - and instead found out that Donald Trump gave Ross Ulbricht a full and unconditional pardon in January 2025. I’ve looked through quite a few reviews and their comments and haven’t seen this mentioned yet. Perhaps I just didn’t look thoroughly enough. But I agree with the pardon: after serving 12 years in a federal penitentiary, I don’t think Ross is a danger to the American public.
Nor did I ever.
While he was clearly a brilliant guy with many great ideas, with the skill set to implement them, I really feel like he just bit off more than he could chew with the entire Silk Road situation. As others have mentioned, he wasn’t the best criminal, and it was clear in this book that he wasn’t comfortable with violence.
Having been raised with extremely libertarian views, Ross only further solidified his convictions as he began college at Penn State, where he’d meet many likeminded individuals who shared the same beliefs, and partake in debates about individual freedoms - namely, victimless crimes and the right for individuals to do as they please, regardless if this behavior is deemed detrimental to one’s health (so long as they are not physically harming others or stealing their property - only then is violence and possible government interference acceptable).
It’s no surprise he’d want to create a legacy, something he’d be remembered for long after he was gone. After all, the only thing more powerful than money (which Ross demonstrated little concern for) is immortality. And given we have yet to develop anything that would give an individual true immortality, the only surefire way to achieve this is to make a difference in history so profound that your name is forever remembered throughout decades, even centuries.
Most people crave this, but most people don’t have the ability to actually make it happen. I think I read somewhere that the number of individuals on this earth at any time who have this ability is incredibly low. Like, maybe ten people out of over eight billion have the ability to make history, and actually make it for over a century, not just a few decades.
With Ross’s libertarian views that people should be able to use drugs as they please, without the government locking them up, along with his computer science abilities and his desire to change the world, it was a perfect storm.
I just can’t understand how people still believe that a “war on drugs” is actually feasible. Endless amounts of money, arrests, imprisonment, and overdose deaths have done absolutely nothing to help the government’s argument that any of this is actually the solution.
Of course drug use harms others. It harms the people who love the person addicted to the drug. Yet, if we arrested people for something similar (like cheating, because you hurt the person’s feelings who you were supposed to be loyal to) - it would be insane. And I agree that if people are going to do something anyway, then they may as well be able to access it as safely as possible.
No, nothing is foolproof. But by having ratings systems for the different sellers on the site, it made it less likely for people to get anything other than what they’d ordered, and less likely to be ripped off, which generally leads to real world violence. I don’t think Preston Bridges’s mother would necessarily still have her son if the Silk Road never existed. She lost her child abruptly at only 16 years of age, and that’s pain no mother should ever experience.
(Preston was the 16 year old who took acid with a group of friends on Prom Night. He himself didn’t purchase the acid from the Silk Road, but rather, a kid who seemed to want to be accepted by him and his friends. Out of all the kids who took it, Preston was the only one who had an adverse reaction. He thought he was losing his mind, and in response, he jumped over their hotel room balcony to his death.)
I understand her anger and her sense of helplessness all too well. But I suppose the real question that should be asked is if Ross Ulbricht was responsible for her son’s death. And I’m sorry, but that’s just inconceivable to me. We don’t know anything about the kid who brought it to Preston and his friends, so it’s likely that had he failed to get acid - or another potentially lethal drug - from the Silk Road, he would have gone elsewhere in search of it. The fact remains that he likely still would have obtained drugs at some point, and Preston made the decision to take them.
That doesn’t make Preston a bad kid. It also doesn’t make Ross Ulbricht liable for his death. Both statements can be true. He was just a kid who made a mistake, as all teenagers do… but one that tragically ended up being fatal.
I feel that in a lot of cases like this, prosecutors will intentionally try to anger the parents of children. Even in cases where parents initially haven’t wanted to press charges, they’ve often been convinced by law enforcement or the prosecutor. After all, nothing makes for a more compelling emotional case against a defendant than parents testifying in front of a jury, pointing their finger at that defendant and stating had it not been for them, their child would still be here. And who wants to tell a grieving parent how they should feel? It’s not the fault of the parents, but those who talk them into this decision, knowing that they’re vulnerable.
Not to say that’s necessarily what happened, but just that it wouldn’t surprise me one bit if they pushed her a little bit (or a lot).
As for the five deaths he supposedly ordered, the evidence was too flimsy, no bodies were ever discovered (so we’re really going with the fact that five murders were all committed so brilliantly that no bodies were ever found?). It wasn’t even in the charges against him. So I’m not really sure why that necessitates it being brought up any more than once.
Besides, the first time it happened, it was the result of dirty undercover FBI agents gone rogue - stealing Bitcoins, then blaming a forum moderator - then suggesting to Ross that they “take out” this (completely innocent) moderator. Is that not coercion? A dirty FBI agent plants the idea in Ross’s head that a trusted moderator of his is stealing over $300,000 in Bitcoin, then tells him if he doesn’t deal with it appropriately (meaning have him murdered) - everyone else will start doing the same thing, ensuing in chaos? After all, if one person could get away with blatantly stealing so much, then why wouldn’t others try it?
The fact that the FBI agents who made the suggestion that Curtis Green be tortured and killed for stealing Bitcoin that they themselves stole, then went on to actually torture the guy (“to make it look real”) - isn’t this far more reprehensible behavior than Ross setting up a website for people to sell drugs as safely as possible?
Yet they each only received six, six and a half year sentences, vs. Ross’s two lifetime sentences. What kind of bullshit is that? They both took pledges to uphold the law and not to abuse their power. Ross didn’t take this pledge. He never would have, given his completely different views on government interference with citizens’ private lives.
They deserved far more serious sentences. It’s pretty obvious they both would have run the Silk Road themselves if they knew no repercussions would result from it. Why else steal close to a million dollars in Bitcoin from a site you’re supposed to be actively working to shut down, or befriend the man who you’re supposed to be hunting down? If you’d call it that. Carl Force was actively taking on multiple identities to supply Ross with “inside information” on the FBI’s internal investigations - for a very hefty price, at that.
All in all though, the book was a pretty quick read and a very interesting one. It drove me crazy that there were 73 chapters in a 336 page book. Come on. I don’t care for 48 page chapters, but surely there’s some middle ground?
I’d recommend it, though.
And for the record - I didn’t feel any “safer” when Ross was behind bars. I don’t feel any “less safe” knowing he’s out. All of the sites popping up to take the Silk Road’s place after it was shut down was a given. Just how it goes on the street: lock up one dealer, another takes his place.
Maybe it’s finally time for us to admit that this has all been a colossal waste of time, and that a different approach - such as harm reduction - should be considered.
If only.
A fun fact: my friend (who shall remain nameless) told me about the Silk Road in 2012. I was looking for the dates because I could have sworn it wasn’t long after TSR opened. It could have been 2011, actually. But I saw it a few times at his house. I never bought anything (lol, seriously) but I’m pretty sure he did. I believe he may have even moderated a bit. He knows far too much about Bitcoin, NFTs, cybersecurity - and has long before these terms entered the mainstream consciousness and lexicon. If you asked him IRL, he’d likely claim he was best buddies with Ross (or DPR, rather) - but that’s definitely not true. I’ve never understood why people exaggerate to such an extent, especially when their stories are interesting just how they are.