What do you think?
Rate this book
Shadowboxing: Representations of Black Feminist Politics
Shadowboxing presents an explosive analysis of the history and practice of black feminisms, drawing upon political theory, history, and cultural studies in a sweepingly interdisciplinary work. Joy James charts new territory by synthesizing theories of social movements with cultural and identity politics. She brings into the spotlight images of black female agency and intellectualism in radical and anti-radical political contexts. From a comparative look at Ida B. Wells, Ella Baker, Angela Davis, and Assata Shakur to analyses of the black woman in white cinema and the black man in feminist coalitions, she focuses attention on the invisible or the forgotten. James convincingly demonstrates how images of powerful women are either consigned to oblivion or transformed into icons robbed of intellectual power. Shadowboxing honors and analyzes the work of black activists and intellectuals and, along the way, redefines the sharp divide between intellectual work and political movements. A daringly original study, this book changes what it means to be American.
239 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1999
About the author
Joy James
40 books118 followersJoy James is the John B. and John T. McCoy Presidential Professor of Humanities and College Professor in Political Science at Williams College. She is the author of Resisting State Violence: Radicalism, Gender, and Race in U.S. Culture, and her edited works on incarceration and human rights include States of Confinement: Policing, Detention, and Prisons and Imprisoned Intellectuals: America's Political Prisoners Write on Life, Liberation, and Rebellion.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
April 20, 2026
A STUDY AND ANALYSIS OF RADICAL BLACK FEMINISM IN AMERICAN POLITICS
Joy James (b. 1958) teaches African-American Studies and Humanities at Williams College; she previously taught at Brown University, Columbia University, the University of Colorado Boulder, and the University of Massachusetts Amherst.
She wrote in the Preface of this 1999 book, “Beyond conventional politics, conditioned under marginality and censure, black feminist power emerges to display a radical singularity, one that has yet be fully theorized. This political theorizing of radical black feminism begins in reflection with … Chapter 1, which provides an autobiographical snapshot of a youth grappling with antiracist feminism evolving amidst black fighters. Emphasizing revolutionary tendencies in women’s resistance politics entails looking at both historical legacies and contemporary practices…
“The search for antiracist community can be measured by the heroic efforts of activist or ancestral African-American women. Most Americans are unfamiliar with the history of militant black female fighters, yet their stories are readily available. [e.g., Ida B. Wells, Angela Davis, Assata Shakur]… In 20th century movements, African Americans fought in marginal sites and forward movements… to build radical communities that challenged political and social exclusion… Following the unique … political maneuvers… black women continuously organized and shaped liberation leadership, leaving significant, although scarcely noticed in conventional politics, imprints on the movements of the 1960s and 1970s….
“Depoliticizing representations promote a restricted, dysfunctional democracy with cultural images that obscure black women’s contributions to democratic politics. Where commercial and stereotypical portrayals of black females center not on political agency but on fetish and animalized sexual imagery, blacks, females, and politics become effaced or distorted… Sexual-racial stereotypes circulating from a dominant culture clash with representations disseminated by black male feminists. Beyond the limiting roles of patriarchal protectors, black males function as both racial and gender allies to black females.”
She explains, “[This book] stands as something of an anomaly in mainstream social and political thought, as well as in black feminist thought. Its discussions seek to unmask political dominance and the limits of liberalism or civil rights advocacy. The book highlights black women’s challenges to state power and antiradicalism within conventional politics and within feminism and antiracist politics, as well as describes how cultural stereotypes obscure political agency. In a sense, this writing mirrors the historical role of blacks, females, and black females as petitioners and agitators in---or appendages and shadows of---American society and politics.” (Pg. 8)
She observes, “Racist and state violence and exploitation as ‘public’ overshadow the ‘private’ violence and exploitation within black families in antiracist rhetoric and organizing. Focusing on structural racism and sexism in the economic market, Baker and Cooke [in ‘All the Women are White, All the Blacks are Men’] make no reference to sexual violence or domestic abuse/exploitation within African American families and communities. Nevertheless, they provide a window for viewing the multiplicity of struggles faced by African American workers…” (Pg. 68)
She asserts, “Although a great impetus for the development of black feminisms came from black liberation movements, antiradicalism within American feminism … obscured black female militancy. Antiradical sentiment, which has led some black feminist writers to dismiss black women’s ideological critiques of black feminist politics as ‘sectarian,’ raises the issue of the place of revolutionary and antirevolutionary thought within progressive black feminism. Black feminist liberation ideology challenges state power by addressing class exploitation, racism, nationalism, and sexual violence with critiques of and activist confrontations with corporate-state policies. The radicalism of feminism recognizes racism, sexism, homophobia, and patriarchy but refuses to make ‘men’ or ‘whites’ or ‘heterosexuals’ the PROBLEM in lieu of confronting corporate power, state authority, and policing.” (Pg. 83-84)
She notes, “Blacks share with gays and prostitutes the stereotypes of being ‘naturally’ and primarily sexual. In fetishized representations, they are all aberrational sexual beings who court their own abuse. This stereotype double rebounds on black gays, lesbians, and bi- and transsexuals. Caricatures fuel the image of racialized groups serving as radicalized sexual spectacles and entertainers for majorities. Progressives critique the images that justify racial-sexual violence and exploitation. Interestingly, among black men, some of the most incisive critiques come from black gay writers and cultural critics, such as James Baldwin, Marlon Riggs, Kobena Mercer, and Isaac Julien, who demystify racialized sexuality and its links to social violence.” (Pg. 140)
She argues, “The criticism that black feminism diverts attention from black liberation, because of its focus on women, parallels the dismissive [view] that black feminism distracts from women’s liberation because of its blackness. Both positions construct barriers that restrict political communities. The walls built by isolationist discourse cause black women who refuse to bind themselves to identities polarized as either ‘black’ or ‘female’ to be accused of gender or racial venality. Their refusal to be bound by one category or another is understandable, given that black feminist formations and politics in the United States, influenced by overlapping cultures and radical struggles, are highly complex.” (Pg. 185)
She concludes, “Resistance has historically challenged and shaped black female conduct across a broad ideological spectrum. Yet it is black women’s autonomy from the pervasive dominance of neoliberalism and corporate culture that opens new avenues for political travel. Radical black feminist politics charts unique paths as an alternative to the political malaise.” (Pg. 189-190)
This book will appeal to those studying contemporary African-American women, feminism, radical politics, and other ‘progressive’ issues.
Joy James (b. 1958) teaches African-American Studies and Humanities at Williams College; she previously taught at Brown University, Columbia University, the University of Colorado Boulder, and the University of Massachusetts Amherst.
She wrote in the Preface of this 1999 book, “Beyond conventional politics, conditioned under marginality and censure, black feminist power emerges to display a radical singularity, one that has yet be fully theorized. This political theorizing of radical black feminism begins in reflection with … Chapter 1, which provides an autobiographical snapshot of a youth grappling with antiracist feminism evolving amidst black fighters. Emphasizing revolutionary tendencies in women’s resistance politics entails looking at both historical legacies and contemporary practices…
“The search for antiracist community can be measured by the heroic efforts of activist or ancestral African-American women. Most Americans are unfamiliar with the history of militant black female fighters, yet their stories are readily available. [e.g., Ida B. Wells, Angela Davis, Assata Shakur]… In 20th century movements, African Americans fought in marginal sites and forward movements… to build radical communities that challenged political and social exclusion… Following the unique … political maneuvers… black women continuously organized and shaped liberation leadership, leaving significant, although scarcely noticed in conventional politics, imprints on the movements of the 1960s and 1970s….
“Depoliticizing representations promote a restricted, dysfunctional democracy with cultural images that obscure black women’s contributions to democratic politics. Where commercial and stereotypical portrayals of black females center not on political agency but on fetish and animalized sexual imagery, blacks, females, and politics become effaced or distorted… Sexual-racial stereotypes circulating from a dominant culture clash with representations disseminated by black male feminists. Beyond the limiting roles of patriarchal protectors, black males function as both racial and gender allies to black females.”
She explains, “[This book] stands as something of an anomaly in mainstream social and political thought, as well as in black feminist thought. Its discussions seek to unmask political dominance and the limits of liberalism or civil rights advocacy. The book highlights black women’s challenges to state power and antiradicalism within conventional politics and within feminism and antiracist politics, as well as describes how cultural stereotypes obscure political agency. In a sense, this writing mirrors the historical role of blacks, females, and black females as petitioners and agitators in---or appendages and shadows of---American society and politics.” (Pg. 8)
She observes, “Racist and state violence and exploitation as ‘public’ overshadow the ‘private’ violence and exploitation within black families in antiracist rhetoric and organizing. Focusing on structural racism and sexism in the economic market, Baker and Cooke [in ‘All the Women are White, All the Blacks are Men’] make no reference to sexual violence or domestic abuse/exploitation within African American families and communities. Nevertheless, they provide a window for viewing the multiplicity of struggles faced by African American workers…” (Pg. 68)
She asserts, “Although a great impetus for the development of black feminisms came from black liberation movements, antiradicalism within American feminism … obscured black female militancy. Antiradical sentiment, which has led some black feminist writers to dismiss black women’s ideological critiques of black feminist politics as ‘sectarian,’ raises the issue of the place of revolutionary and antirevolutionary thought within progressive black feminism. Black feminist liberation ideology challenges state power by addressing class exploitation, racism, nationalism, and sexual violence with critiques of and activist confrontations with corporate-state policies. The radicalism of feminism recognizes racism, sexism, homophobia, and patriarchy but refuses to make ‘men’ or ‘whites’ or ‘heterosexuals’ the PROBLEM in lieu of confronting corporate power, state authority, and policing.” (Pg. 83-84)
She notes, “Blacks share with gays and prostitutes the stereotypes of being ‘naturally’ and primarily sexual. In fetishized representations, they are all aberrational sexual beings who court their own abuse. This stereotype double rebounds on black gays, lesbians, and bi- and transsexuals. Caricatures fuel the image of racialized groups serving as radicalized sexual spectacles and entertainers for majorities. Progressives critique the images that justify racial-sexual violence and exploitation. Interestingly, among black men, some of the most incisive critiques come from black gay writers and cultural critics, such as James Baldwin, Marlon Riggs, Kobena Mercer, and Isaac Julien, who demystify racialized sexuality and its links to social violence.” (Pg. 140)
She argues, “The criticism that black feminism diverts attention from black liberation, because of its focus on women, parallels the dismissive [view] that black feminism distracts from women’s liberation because of its blackness. Both positions construct barriers that restrict political communities. The walls built by isolationist discourse cause black women who refuse to bind themselves to identities polarized as either ‘black’ or ‘female’ to be accused of gender or racial venality. Their refusal to be bound by one category or another is understandable, given that black feminist formations and politics in the United States, influenced by overlapping cultures and radical struggles, are highly complex.” (Pg. 185)
She concludes, “Resistance has historically challenged and shaped black female conduct across a broad ideological spectrum. Yet it is black women’s autonomy from the pervasive dominance of neoliberalism and corporate culture that opens new avenues for political travel. Radical black feminist politics charts unique paths as an alternative to the political malaise.” (Pg. 189-190)
This book will appeal to those studying contemporary African-American women, feminism, radical politics, and other ‘progressive’ issues.
December 16, 2008
this b00k rulez!
Read
June 23, 2016quotes i like: "part of the racialized attraction or aversion for the black in a society obsessed with race, sex, and violence is the appeal of exotica tinged with racial savagery and perversity"
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews