What do you think?
Rate this book


256 pages, Paperback
Published January 2, 2018
I am sympathetic to this objection. Even if we cannot help making truth claims, maybe it is arrogant to be confident about our truth claims when we are so limited in our understanding. The implications of this thought are frightening. Take our ethical beliefs, for instance. If we cannot have any confidence in them, what practices that we now approve of and are complicit in will be considered horrendously evil several hundred years from now? And who will be right, us or them? That’s a scary thought.
The ending of the paragraph is typical of the book - they begin with a philosophical line of argument, and then end with an emotional statement, "That's a scary thought." Not is it correct, or is it illogical, but it is "frightening."
Overall, the authors so desperately want there to be a moral or ethical absolute and a god that created it all, that most of their argument is that they really really really don't want to live in a world where there is no god and no moral certainty, so shouldn't we all just believe so it feels like there is some purpose? And aren't the teachings of Jesus so much more comfortable to believe and desirable than the alternatives?
I spent a lot of time reading this book carefully but felt like in the end it was time wasted. I tried my best to be open minded (and I did walk away with a couple of interesting challenges to evolutionary theory that I am going to research), but in the end didn't feel like I found authors who were up to the task.
Each (of the anti-Christian 'isms') takes a partial explanation and claims for it explanatory omnipotence.