This novel is a concoction of countless Noongar voices from the past and today. Consequently, the narrative progresses with an interplay between dialogue and intertextuality. The dialogue-generated competition between the colonisers colonised, subject and object, centre and margin, white and the Noongars, is portrayed in this multivoiced narration that provides the textual frame a varied topography.
In this dialogue, the dominated group is able to transform and problematize the colonial and modern practises and assumptions.
The archive writings on which this novel relies are miniature representations of European / colonial / modern meta-narratives, which are subsequently "written back" by incorporating marginal stories that had previously been left out. In effect, Harley's "basic family history, most local of histories," which he reconstructs from his grandfather Ern's records and his uncles, Will and Jack's stories, undermine Ern's Nevillian eugenic project. It covers the lives of four generations.
Ern believed that this Noongar controlled breeding arrangement would standardize the birth of the "first white guy" in his family. This "narration" or "performance" of the current hidebound philosophy that the white state supports / regulates is a counter-discourse. In a sneaky "performative" way, Harley's memory, which is a combination of more than a few ancestors' and existing voices from his community - crosses the immovable, parallel, didactic white past, causing constant slippages.
However, what makes the storytelling more idiosyncratic and characteristic is its employment of the elements of intertextuality, irony, allegory, magic ory, magic realism, and Aboriginal English. Harley's or Scott's use of storytelling technique may be in effect a strategy to bring to the forefront the quintessential Aboriginal element and thereby create a counter discourse to the linear documented history of the colonial whites.
A word on Scott's use of intertextuality in the novel: - Well, the polyphonic community voice is ventilated through oral histories and the memories of Noongar Elders if intertextuality includes the use of the language of the state and its apparatuses, such as newspaper rticles, notebooks kept by State employees, eugenicist records, and anthropological notes.
The use of irony and metaphor is a noteworthy postcolonial stylization that gives Soctt's writing a poetic, yet politicised, essence. Ernest Solomon Scat is a moniker Scott decisively chose as a hurtful irony at the man.
The articulation of cultural distinctions results in the creation of Harley's identity. Instead of attempting to define what it means to be Noongar or Indigenous, Scott views indigenousness as a cultural construct that is repetitively embryonic. Harley is unaware of his identity.
He must, in a sense, start over, though not with the "clean slate" Ern imagines, but rather by developing his ability to pay close attention, feel, and be open to new ways of knowing and being. ‘Who am I now?’ might be asked in the exposed, unconsolated speaking position. How should I say this?
Scott has the opportunity to reconnoiter the convolution of postcolonial Australia by speaking from a position of vulnerable identification. We must look at the connectivity that history has forced upon us because it is too late for us to forget one another.
Through his unconsoled narrator, who barely has any real authority, Scott investigates this interwoven history. Harley's indistinctness, however, draws attention to the wide range of opt of options that are open to him.
The potential for Australia to transcend current racial tensions and shed the mindset that confines man to a past that forbids him from becoming anything other than what they are, is sufficiently made clear to Scott's readers.
By writing from a liminal place, Scott enables the Nyoongar people in Benang to express alternate conceptions of identity and belonging, which will work to undermine white domination.