(I was given an Advance Reading Copy of this book with no expectation of a review.)
The Innocents depicts a young Bruno Johnson, a newly minted LA County Sheriff Violent Crimes detective, who has to go undercover to investigate internal corruption. But right from the beginning, things get complicated. Exactly who is corrupt--the supervisor who assigns him, the cops he surveils, or somebody higher up the chain...and will Bruno end up as corrupt as the target?
This is a great story. The action is well-paced, the characters are distinct and authentic, and the drama is intense, but there's another level, something I treasure in a novel: a character's introspection as he or she evolves. In the case of Bruno Johnson, we see a young detective being forged in the dark fires of undercover internal affairs. The fact that the book was written by a career law enforcement professional makes it that much more authentic. It feels real.
Bruno wants to do good and be good, but he's a hunter of men, and there's a part of him that lives for the hunt. This good man has his dark side, and as he alternately gives rein or reins in, we so identify with the rage, terror, and regret. The sense of extreme danger is relentless in this story. You can feel what it would be like to be there, and you just can’t relax. The dramatic suspense never lets up, and you cannot stop reading.
There are no super powers here. Bruno is us. He's a regular human, not a TV hero who can MacGuyver his way through the rough spots. As he sweats a life-threatening situation, you feel as if you are there. It’s sobering to think this author was in such (or similar) situations, or if not he, his colleagues.
Here's Bruno, a thinking cop who wonders about human motivation as he fears his own corruption. In this case, he’s pondering a bad, scary, evil coworker: "I wanted to know how it felt to kill two human beings, what it did to his soul. It had to tear off a big chunk, a piece never to return, bringing his soul closer to the edge of extinction...How much soul did one person have to risk? And how much did (my coworker) have left?"
Bruno can see the good in bad people, and vice versa. David Putnam is really good at writing nuanced characters, and in doing so, he keeps us from being able to figure out the answers. Which is where Bruno finds himself. Is the bad guy really at fault, or is he being set up by the “good” guys? What’s the right move? Is Bruno a hero or a chump? As with real life, sometimes you don’t know until the end, or until it’s too late.
Here's another example, where Bruno considers doing the wrong thing for the right reasons. As he sits in a sweaty office trailer where he’s in extreme danger, Bruno is thinking of going outside the law. He gets "...the sudden and bitter taste of revenge, and I fought it, a battle of right and wrong that didn't last. I slipped that much closer to the other side, to the evil I'd dedicated my life to chasing."
The ending is perfect. I enjoyed this younger version of Bruno Johnson very much, and I hope Putnam will continue writing about him.