So yes, I do generally find Marc Aronson and John W. Glenn’s presented narrative in their The World Made New: Why the Age of Exploration Happened and How It Changed the World interesting, educational and as such also pretty much full of enlightenment (and with the accompanying visuals providing an aesthetically appealing enough mirror, although one that for me personally also kind of has felt a trifle distracting and even almost throwing me out of the text proper a few times).
But with regard to set-up, organisation, choice of vocabulary, narrationally speaking with The World Made New: Why the Age of Exploration Happened and How It Changed the World Marc Aronson and John W. Glenn do feature and present a pretty densely informational text that is definitely rather wordy and detailed, but also and thankfully never penned by the two authors in an overly complex manner, and thus in my opinion perfect for introducing young readers from about the age of ten or so to the so-called Age of Exploration (and discovery), although The World Made New: Why the Age of Exploration Happened and How It Changed the World would actually also work pretty decently for interested adults wanting an extensive but not too specifically and overly intensive introduction to the conquest and colonisation of the so-called New World, of North and South America.
However, while I do of course appreciate how generally balanced Marc Aronson and and John W. Glenn are being, have been with regard to analysing the results and the consequences of these voyages of discovery and conquest for the Native populations encountered, and that in The World Made New: Why the Age of Exploration Happened and How It Changed the World there is thankfully no longer any uncritical hero worshipping of individuals like Christoper Columbus present, I still rather do not at all think that textually and thematically speaking Aronson and Glenn go nearly far enough with their criticisms, in other words that The World Made New: Why the Age of Exploration Happened and How It Changed the World still does not in my opinion do nearly enough unilaterally and utterly condemning the negative and bigoted attitudes of the explorers, of their backers, of their fellow Europeans regarding the Aztecs, the Incas, the Native populations of the Americas. And as such, I also do find it ridiculous and painfully laughable that some moronic reviewers on in particular Amazon actually seem to actively consider The World Made New: Why the Age of Exploration Happened and How It Changed the World a totally left wing rant and just because there is some necessary and deserved condemnation of the Age of Exploration, there is criticism of individuals like Christopher Columbus and other explorers to be encountered (and I guess that these same silly doughbrains would likely now equally label me a radical Communist since I am in fact saying that the critical attitudes and analyses of the authors regarding exploration and colonisation actually for me are still more than a bit insufficient).
Three stars in general for The World Made New: Why the Age of Exploration Happened and How It Changed the World (as I am definitely rather a bit disappointed that Marc Aronson and John W. Glenn have not been more specifically and all encompassingly condemning towards the negative and for the most part racist and bigoted attitudes of the explorers and colonisers towards the individuals, towards the tribes and civilizations they encountered in North and South America) but upped to four stars, as I do think that The World Made New: Why the Age of Exploration Happened and How It Changed the World presents a generally decent and also striving to be thematically balanced enough text, and that yes, the included bibliographic materials (containing both books and relevant web sites) is truly outstanding and greatly increases the supplemental research value of The World Made New: Why the Age of Exploration Happened and How It Changed the World.