For more than fifty years and for millions of readers around the world, the New Daily Study Bible commentaries have been the ideal help for both devotional and serious Bible study. William Barclay's brilliant communication, down-to-earth approach, and sheer enthusiasm have inspired generations of readers. These new editions contain a new foreword from renowned theologian and author Alister McGrath, along with updated language to clarify less familiar illustrations from the originals and the inclusion of more contemporary language.
In his introduction to this volume, William Barclay explains why the first three Gospels are called "synoptic," how they came to be written, and why many scholars believe that Mark was the first. Barclay's interpretation of the Gospel is full of wisdom, and it offers clear and captivating insight from beginning to end. Having picked up one section to study, the reader will find it difficult to stop reading until the whole volume is completed.
WIlliam Barclay was a Scottish author, radio and television presenter, Church of Scotland minister, and Professor of Divinity and Biblical Criticism at the University of Glasgow. He wrote a popular set of Bible commentaries on the New Testament that sold 1.5 million copies.
The historical references are explained. The differences between cultures are explained and expanded upon.
This is the first of his commentaries that I have read through completely and will be doing this again. The way he breaks down the scriptures it's very easy to also use his commentaries as a daily bible study.
I am surprised at how well this commentary continues to deliver insights that are relevant and helpful for me as I strive to "build a faith that works in real life." Too many commentaries from this era (1960s - 1980s) focused on things that were "TBU" (True But Useless) - history, sociology, form criticism, Mark's messed up ending, etc. You can't find the eternal truths of Scripture if you focus solely on historical context. You can't find spiritual insights when you reduce your study of scripture to sociological investigations. Don't even ask me what I think about focusing on the politics implicit in these Scriptures! Form criticism slices and dices Scripture like a ginsu knife. Great for food preparation; not so great for finding the big picture in Scripture. Barclay does some of that, but what's different with his approach is that those scholarly investigations are always brought back to making them relevant to our on-going spiritual formation as disciples. For me, the only real diminishment of this commentary because of its age is that his illustrations are all very dated, and very Anglo-centric. But I have enough imagination, flexibility, and creativity to replace those dated illustrations and quotations with ones more fitting to my life experiences. The biggest take-away I have from this commentary is Barclay's understanding of the difference between KNOWING JESUS and KNOWING ABOUT Jesus. Historical and sociological biblical criticism will tell you many things ABOUT Jesus. That is information TBU. Barclay is focused on helping the reader KNOW JESUS PERSONALLY. Which is what I'm looking for in a commentary--a mentor of sorts to help me become a more fully devoted follower of Jesus.
William Barclay is as robust a Bible Scholar as I have come across. This commentary on the Gospel of Mark is packed with historical insight to accompany the Gospel story. It strikes me that Barclay’s is quite a progressive theology for its day (1940s), although this could be the way I have read it through my own theological lens. There are plenty of anachronisms as you would expect from a book that is over 80 years old, but it stands up well and as a devotional book, separated into clear, concise portions intended to be read one-per-day, it is both educating and inspiring. Too Many devotional books today lack depth. This is an excellent example of how simple, regular, time-pressured study does not have to be superficial.
When Barclary's good, he's very good. When he's bad, he's nigh heretical. Some of his insights are faith-building, detailed, and eminently practical. However, then there are sections of doubt. For instance, on the account of Jesus cursing the fig-tree, he writes, "The story does not ring true" (269), that "the whole account is unreasonable" (270). In other places, he cites the profitability of allegorical rather than literalistic readings. Recommended with reservations.
Barclay’s commentary on Mark is excellent, particularly strong on historical timelines, cultures, and geography. It really helps flesh out the context, and the stories from Mark’s Gospel become much more vivid and powerful. It’s inspiring for daily study and still holds up, despite when it was written. Barclay’s own beliefs peek in sometimes (very slightly), but for the most part it is very faithful and theologically sound. For an example, he doesn’t believe in demons or evil spirits, he explains that Jews at the time believed in spirits, and Jesus acted in ways that made people believe he was exorcising them, in line with their worldview.
Though not in absolute agreement with some aspects of Barclay's personal faith, his scholarship and commentary on Mark's gospel is exceptional. I thoroughly enjoyed the book and benefitted from his excellent work. The DSB has become a staple in my personal devotional life.
For several years I have enjoyed this series as my devotional material. It is thorough and faithful, and I look forward to continuing through the books I have not enjoyed yet.
Loved this book like all of Barclay’s commentaries. They offer an absolutely fascinating insight into the Gospels and are brilliant back ground reading for anyone interested in delving deeper, who leads a small group or is planning a preach.
I like Barclay's style if writing and insights, but for daily reading in Bishop Lewis' challenge, I didn't really have time to do more than scan, so my reading is a bit skewed.
I will definitely get more of his commentaries. It brings background of the time and culture into context so there can be a better understanding of Scripture.
Barclay's commentaries are truly amazing--especially considering that he managed to compile all of this information without a computerized filing system. Some of his 'modern-day' analogies are no longer modern and a bit cutesy/quirky, but all's forgiven considering the timeless relevance of the Word.
Again, I really enjoyed interacting with Barclay, not that I'm yet comfortable with it being on my Kindle rather than a red-covered paperback (or is that dating myself?).
And to paraphrase my review of Michael Card's Mark: Reading the two in tandem a daily treat.