I mean, seriously!
What a treat! Despite the fact that i tend to dismiss books written in older times, or in this case located in the late fifties, Lindsay may have changed my mind. I don't know, exactly, what happened in the first book, although broad hints are dropped. Even major plot points, I assume. But it would appear to be an origin story I'm very likely going to pickup and read.
There's a roguish ( as in like a rogue) quality to Lindsay's writing. Like everything is seen from a slightly altered point of view. Lou Fleener is anything but the handsome detective generally pictured by most. Short, overweight and balding, he's a man of many surprises. Turns out he's quite a fighter - who tends to offer commentary as he beats the deal out of opponents. According to Cassidy Adams, his sexy and beautiful wife ( who he knows is too good for him), he's a dreamy dancer AND great in bed. "His hands," she confides to the soon to be loved of the third member of their group. Dion Monkton is the dreamboat, the gorgeous guy who is both the financial whiz and the tongue-tied klutz. The three of them evidently outsmarted the Chicago mob and now have their money.
Returning to Chicago after cooling off in California, Monk decided to become a financial advisor while Lou meets up shop as a PI, aided by Cassidy. Their first client is an older woman who is sure her neighbor is a former Nazi prison guard. (He is. Of course he is.). She disappears, and that begins the adventure.
There's a lot to enjoy about it. First off, Lindsay's an imaginative and creative writer when it comes to dialogue. I'm reminded of the Honeymooners, "who's on first" and the Marx Brothers at times. Next, he has a good memory for the to mess and the culture, which, combined with his comedic flair, is responsible for numerous smiles, chuckles and laughs. His characters are unique and the story itself is solid.
There was one minor piece where I felt myself cringe -but I suspect it's more a product of our current culture. If your grandfather who lived back in the 50's and 60's, told stories about them and used language that nowadays got people upset, you would have to deal with your reaction, right? Same here. What saves it from being a problem is that the passages in question are authentic. It will be interesting to see if, later in the series, that changes.
Don't let my little point of concern stop you, though. Pick this one up and have fun !